Yeah, I'm just doing this to get a response, but its so true...there are million more talented bands out there....it makes me wanna throw up a little.
2007-03-15 04:17:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Based on what in comparison do they "suck"? You've actually named three of the most talented and innovative bands that have been around. They may not be your taste, but, by no means do they "suck".
Horrible comment when you have nothing to back this statement up.
2007-03-16 06:11:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you are going by your personal preferrence, then sure, but if you are going by talent, you could not be more WRONG. There is your reaction you are looking for. These artist have more music talent in their pink finger than bands that you probably enjoy have in the whole band. By "more talented" band, you are probably either into crap rock, like nickelback and creed, or no talent rock, like Green Day or some stuff like that. It makes me wonder what your definition of talent is???
2007-03-15 12:03:52 · answer #2 · answered by mattyjmania 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be hatin'
besides, talent is subjective. Just because you don't happen to shre in the opinion of millions of other people doesn't make yours or theirs wrong.
2007-03-15 11:22:17 · answer #3 · answered by Michael L 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I realized this... I also think Dave Matthews is not from this planet..
2007-03-15 11:26:02 · answer #4 · answered by ♫ՖքØØķ¥♫ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I remember a teacher telling me one time: You can say you don't like something, but don't say it's no good. Art of any type is subjective.
2007-03-15 12:04:43 · answer #5 · answered by kimglf 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i couldnt agree more
2007-03-15 11:25:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋