Here is an interesting Youtube film. See and then you decide!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
2007-03-15 02:40:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well this would the 64,000 dollar question. This is the greatest part of the global warming debate in general. A majority of scientists do appear to agree that global warming is occurring based on an observable model. However, there is no such consensus or acceptance as to the overall cause. In short there is just no evidence to support a conclusion that global warming is man made, or that we can effect the overall climate on any tangible level. The die hard global warming crowd can't properly rectify this paradox in their thinking process and therefore have attempted to silence all debate on the issue by labeling anyone who disagrees as either in the pocket of big oil, or against environmentalism in general. Just remember that when you have one side trying to stifle debate on any issue it means they are trying to hide something, their arguments cannot stand up to proper scrutiny, or both. Science is not and never should be about consensus. It should be about finding evidence which can be factually supported.
Dexter: If you are going to try to discredit factual evidence, at least try to do it in factual manner. Below is a link to the story about the UN study. Note that this link points directly to the UN News site.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20772&Cr=global&Cr1=warming
2007-03-15 03:10:10 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't watch it all, but the first few minutes are dead-on.
CO2 accounts for around 2% of the total "greenhouse gases". That's current, even after the Industrial Revolution. A DOUBLING of this amount would mean a total greenhouse gas increase of ... 2%, and even that assumes that nothing else changes.
Taking the Doomsday models that the Global Warming crowd presents to "prove" that we're all going to die from the effects in ten to forty years, and using them on known data from 1850 to present, the models do not accurately predict what we know to have been true.
Lemmings.
2007-03-15 09:52:16 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is. Check out the link below. I assume the youtube link is to the great Global Warming Swindle! Well here is how the program was just a pack of lies that conservatives simply swallowed without thinking! Funny how they do that!
2007-03-15 09:57:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course not. Man made CO2 makes up such a minuscule amount of total green house gases that any effect would be impossible. The only way to stop man made CO2 is to eliminate man. How would support an agenda that calls for ones extinction
2007-03-15 09:46:15 · answer #4 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"The UN says cows are more responsable for generated CO2 then people."
Ummmm...hmm, how do I say this? Well, the U.N. never said that, ever. Something tells me the guy who read this didn't hear of the panel report from early February that attributed it to fossil fuel consumption.
2007-03-15 09:59:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The main cause for the global warming is the sun.
2007-03-15 09:47:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
no. the co2 is generated by the global warming. the sun warms the earth. same as it does on mars. it is warming on mars too. not one SUV on mars btw.
the ocean's surface generates the most co2. does Al Gore propose we drain it?
2007-03-15 09:45:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
hahahha, but fumes from volcanic activities in the pacific has released more carbon monoxide than the all the CO released by cars in canada.
2007-03-15 09:48:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The UN says cows are more responsable for generated CO2 then people.
2007-03-15 09:48:27 · answer #9 · answered by JB 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not according to scientists Al forgot to pay off.
2007-03-15 09:51:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋