And none of this NEOCON lie that Clinton was impeached, my professor said that Clinton's impeachment wasn't real because it was driven by a few fanatic neocons in Congress and once Obama is elected in '08, he will remove Clinton's supposed 'impeachment' from the records FOREVER!
2007-03-15 02:37:33 · 23 answers · asked by Indy Plume 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Nixon was never impeached. Clinton was. Get your facts straight. I'm sure even as a liberal you can read and understand facts.
2007-03-15 02:40:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
First, Nixon was never impeached; he resigned before it happened. Second, Andrew Johnson and Clinton were both impeached, though neither were removed. Third, Clinton's impeachment was real; I watched the news broadcasts of it. Fourth, Bush has not done anything to be impeached over. It was Congress, not Bush, who voted on going to war. Fifth, as for Obama, I like him a lot, but his voting record is way too liberal. He stands very little chance on a national level. Sixth, you should demand your money back from your school; you clearly aren't learning anything useful or true.
2007-03-15 04:01:10 · answer #2 · answered by seattlefan74 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The fact that your professor is unable to face the truth about his hero's does not change the fact that Clinton was impeached. I wonder if your mom and dad realize how poorly spent their money is at the indoctrination center disguised as an institution of learning is. No future president can remove records of impeachment in this country, of course in the fantasy land your proff envisions our country would be much like the old Soviet Union where rewriting history was a common practice. Several questions for you. 1) when demo crates reference Clinton's impeachments are they just neocons in disguise 2) do you believe you should be allowed to have your own set of facts to justify your political opinions,3) For what would Bush be impeached. 4) Is there any way you can challenge your proff idiocy with the volumes of testimony recorded for history on Clinton's impeachment. 5) Do you really think you are being educated at the school you attend of is indoctrination your goal?
2007-03-15 03:08:30 · answer #3 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tell your socialist professor that Nixon was not impeached he resigned, Bill Clinton was not only impeached he was stripped of his law license and that reality is what happened not what you stupid professor thinks should have happened. Subsequent Presidents cannot remove impeachments from records.
The record stands for all of time, Andrew Johnson and William Clinton are the only two presidents to be impeached.
And President Bush will not be impeached.
I hope the rest of you are reading what this socialist professor is teaching. What more proof do any of you need that you are not being taught you are being indoctrinated?
2007-03-15 03:02:19 · answer #4 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Clinton was impeached. You may want to question your learning institiution selection process. The professors seem very slanted and you may want to question their methods. Or is this a fortune telling college? Pardoning Clinton from impeachment does not whip it from history books. And second of all Nixon was not impeached. He resigned before he could be. So your really striking out here. But to answer your question, no Bush will not be impeached. With what little time he has left it wouldn't be worth the time and there are no grounds for impeachment. Keep studying, I see you need it.
2007-03-15 02:43:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nixon wasn't impeached. He resigned before he could be. Clinton was. If he wasn't then there would be nothing for Obama to remove (even if that were possible). You're professor is teaching you propaganda instead of facts. Bush will not be impeached. You really should find a new school.
2007-03-15 02:51:39 · answer #6 · answered by JB 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your professor is a moron. Not just an ordinary moron, but a total moron.
First of all, Nixon wasn't impeached. Had he not resigned it is likely to have happened, but he was not impeached.
Second, Clinton WAS impeached. He was impeached by the House of Representatives, but not convicted by the Senate. Their failure to convict does not alter the fact that he was impeached.
There is nothing anyone can do to remove Clinton's impeachment from the records except lie.
Your professor is either phenomenally stupid or a very ordinary liar.
2007-03-15 02:42:48 · answer #7 · answered by open4one 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Where is this Obama removing Clinton's impeachement from the record forever thought coming from? Can you provide a link to where exactly he has said that???
Bush will not be impeached, but he should be. To do that would put Cheney in power. Cheney has a worse (known) record than Bush. As much as it should happen, it won't.
2007-03-15 02:42:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, since Nixon wasn't impeached, I'm not sure how to answer.
Remove an impeachment from the records. That's a good one. You're very entertaining.
2007-03-15 02:50:42 · answer #9 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
and when do you think this impeachment will take place? the year 2032, and on what grounds? and as for Obama, if hes your cant miss ringer to win the presidency, an ex drug and alcohol abuser much like your nemesis Bush, I fail to see a difference between him and our current president.
Ohhh, it must be from his many years of proving what a great and just political leader he is, right? ...................No wait, he was elected for the first time only a few years ago.
If you want to blame someone, blame Bud Selig, if it wasn't for him, George W. Bush would be the commisioner of baseball right now.
And whatever professor your listening to, you need to realize that he is teaching at your community college or clown college or Subway university for a reason.
2007-03-15 02:45:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but your professor is wrong. Nixon wasn't impeached, and Clinton WAS. Unfair or unnecessary, either way, it still stands.
I'm a raving liberal, too, so none of that "neocon" stuff.
2007-03-15 02:46:04 · answer #11 · answered by Morning Glory 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋