English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For all the people who have posted about this conspiricy could you show proof of this connection?

2007-03-15 02:02:08 · 8 answers · asked by ken 6 in News & Events Media & Journalism

8 answers

I'll bet ya ten bucks that the left wing 9/11 conspiracy nuts will be saying that KSM is the "fall guy".

2007-03-15 02:06:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

KSM and Mr. Zawhari weren't something extra suitable than Al Queda's political device. They have been people who amassed up the hijackers and supported the gang in the sphere. in fact, in the last decade before 9/11 KSM toured america elevating money for jihad in comparison united states of america and the Isrealis. Bin encumbered isn't something extra suitable than the guy who has all the money. the real means is the lads in the back of him.They do all the recruiting and the making plans. there is no longer something new to this.

2016-10-02 04:03:08 · answer #2 · answered by condom 4 · 0 0

You have been so mislead. Why would our president do such a horrible thing to his people. We aren't a third world country with a tyrant like Iraq. He is far from it. This is a load of bullcrap. He never did this. This guy Khalid did since he admitted to it. It was the terrorists who caused 9/11 not Mr. Bush.

2007-03-15 02:14:13 · answer #3 · answered by greylady 6 · 3 1

Every plot needs a patsy...Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was one of Bin Laden's lackeys who makes a good stooge. Of course since he doesn't have a lawyer and his "trial" is in a secret prison in Cuba in front of three military officers none of us will ever get to talk to him...or ever see him again. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed meet Lee Harvey Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan your patsy brother cast-offs from the Bush crime family.

2007-03-15 06:54:49 · answer #4 · answered by Perry L 5 · 0 2

Yeah why would OUR amazing president do such horrible things to his own people? Just because he wanted to start a war in the Middle East and needed a reason. Oh please tell me that its not true. Please no Bush, please say that the wings of the plane that hit the Pentagon are still in the air because they sure as hell didn't go with the plane into the Pentagon. Please no Bush, did you really do this just to go to attack Al Qaeda before you found out they were being trained in Iraq and getting weapons from Iraq so we could go attack them. Bush had a perfect reason to plan these attacks, he wanted to do something that his daddy couldn't do, catch Saddam and have him killed, all George W needed was a reason and he got that with 9/11. Mohammed just wants to get out of Gitmo however he can and the only way the Bush administration would let him out is by admitting to 9/11 and eventually hanging him....lets all have a party now because there is no way that Bush organized 9/11 because he had no reason to.

2007-03-15 02:35:14 · answer #5 · answered by carolina4obama 1 · 1 4

If you show proof Bush organized 911 first...oh wait, you can't because it is a load of crap.

2007-03-15 02:04:54 · answer #6 · answered by steven c 2 · 5 1

Right after you show me proof of your claim.
No you can't use make believe flims like loose change.

Something that does take quotes out of context or "experts" who weren't there or didn't see any of the physical evidence.

Something that could stand up in court.

2007-03-15 02:08:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Wow, you give him WAY too much credit.

2007-03-15 02:09:35 · answer #8 · answered by Catalin 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers