2007-03-15 01:32:09 · 13 answers · asked by alpa 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Business - no ethics.
2007-03-15 01:34:50 · answer #1 · answered by Expression 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is true that every cigarette smoking reduces five minutes of your span of life & creates nicotine which can result cancers too. Your question is what differentiates science from religion. Here I'm with you that it is NOT ethical to still manufacture cigarettes. Many Indian states prohibited wine. Hopefully , one day the turn of cigarette will also come. Don't be disappointed. Be tension free & enjoy your life well. Do not forget to write about this to health ministry of your state with proper procedure & forget.
2007-03-15 18:44:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same is related to many other productions and ways of life. It is a commercial approach for the ruling front to boast regarding the economy of the nation. They neither stop it nor control it, but encash it. It is to a small percentage ethical, but great is unethical. The local assocations also back as the life-style does not make educated man stay at one place because of the reduction of the world-size.
2007-03-15 23:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is certainly unethical to promote things like cigarette, alcohol and such other things that spoil the habits of our people.It is the necessity of multinational countries to earn more revenue by hook or crook.When things are conducive to them it is better that we educate our people about the negative aspects of these things and other drugs. Wise and intelligent people are now keeping these things away from them but the poor and the illiterates are showing more affinity towards these things. Social organisations, governments and educational institutions can contribute a lot to get rid of this manace from our society.
2007-03-18 21:33:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why cigarettes, what about adulterated food? nothing is ethical in the world of business.what about alchohol?. The point is, why do parents allow their children to start on these bad habits initially. If they make them strong, there won't be any problem.
2007-03-15 03:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by kumarcl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I support the manufacturing of cigrette, not because of the seven lakh die of lung cancer, but the temporary relief a smoker gets from a few moments of smoking is far more greater than the permanent death. Since death is sure for everyone, it is useless to think of it or try to avoid it. it is always to early to die. but the misery of day to day life are more painfull than a one time death, cigrette releives a person temporary from the thought of death and destruction
2007-03-15 01:40:26 · answer #6 · answered by eyenistiene 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in freedom. As long as there is clear information about the effects of cigarettes people have the right to choose their own poison. I am in favor though of banning cigarettes in public spaces, I believe in freedom but I don't believe you can impose your habits in others
2007-03-15 01:38:17 · answer #7 · answered by rickyhunter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is not ethical but stoping manufacturing is also not possible except educating.motivating every smoker to give up the bad habit and new not to swich on.
2007-03-15 21:00:03 · answer #8 · answered by patriotisam 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well no one is being forced to smoke rite. india is a free country where each individual has the rite to make the decision
2007-03-15 01:38:16 · answer #9 · answered by Remo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure - it turns out all nonsmokers die too.
2007-03-15 01:36:24 · answer #10 · answered by k_e_p_l_e_r 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋