Sitchin is a linquist who believes the Sumerians tell of the true human origins and of DNA experiments by gods from a planet called Niberu.
2007-03-15 00:25:51 · 7 answers · asked by sassycatarcher 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
It is no less plausible than Christianity. The one problem is if they “the Anunnaki genetically engineered Homo sapiens as slave animals to work in their gold mines by crossing extraterrestrial genes with those of Homo erectus.”
So if Homo erectus had already evolved than why not just take the next step and say we did too. And stop all this “god’s will” stuff to explain what do not yet understand
2007-03-15 01:04:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
nicely, evolution is previous available, that's a actuality. This discovery of cryptomycota may nicely be a project to fit in with previous information of fungal evolutionary progression, in spite of the undeniable fact that the finest tenants of evolution at the prompt are not challenged by ability of this discovery. It not in any respect fails to baffle me why some human beings equate technology's dedicated pursuit of the actuality to some thing incorrect and incorrect. once you pursue a actuality in any respect expenditures, you strengthen theories, attempt/discover information, and regulate as mandatory. Getting it incorrect the first time (and the 2d, the 0.33, and so on) is beside the point to the actuality of the finest result which theoretically is the real actuality. The fulfillment of the clinical technique is so tremendous, that's a ask your self that the non secular community hasn't embraced it in order to discover the actuality of their non secular convictions.
2016-12-02 01:07:49 · answer #2 · answered by troxell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I do not; and for a very good reason.
Mr. Sitchin offers no testable hypothesis. It is not enough to say, "There is something which is not currently explained, so here is my alternative explanation." You have to go one step further and add "And here is how my explanation can be tested." He offers nothing of the kind.
That means to me that he is just selling books to people who do not seem to want to ask the hard questions.
HTH
Charles
2007-03-15 01:58:10 · answer #3 · answered by Charles 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll answer with another question:
Why would you believe a linguist to unravel the scientific mysteries of the universe?
If your going to believe that crap, why arent you a Scientologist?
Its basically the same thing...believing aliens came to this planet and sacrificed other aliens in our volcanos...
Come on people...
2007-03-15 00:40:12 · answer #4 · answered by Beach_Bum 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
he was smart man
who understood many thigs about the past the alien presence
along history
he just got the rong conclusion, that is what those aliens liked, to be worshiped like god, witch there are not
2007-03-15 01:55:30 · answer #5 · answered by infinate wisdom 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope ... he's just selling books to gullible people and he doesn't have a theory. His rantings are not based on any scientific data; just his own rhetoric.
2007-03-15 00:51:59 · answer #6 · answered by Gene 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, I don't.
But I did use his theorys in a series of short storys (fiction).
2007-03-15 02:56:14 · answer #7 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋