Let me guess - are conservatives willing to believe a terrorist?

Question

When Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confesses that he is solely responsible for the 9/11 attacks, are Republicans just going to eat that up like ice cream, or do they possibly think there are others involved in the planning that we haven't caught yet?

Okay, extremist conservatives - I never said he wasn't INVOLVED. I'm only saying he's not the only one. In what way does this mean I have any "agenda" except to want those responsible punished, you morons?

Answer 1

If this Khalid is now claiming to be responsible for 9/11 after six years, I think they are trying to divert our attention from Bin Laden or Bin Laden is dead. Conversatives would then have justification for being in Iraq and not having caught Bin Laden. Sounds like another Bush "smoke and mirrors" routine.

Answer 2

No, but the evidence is pretty clear that he was the taskmaster behind the plan that became the 9/11 attacks.
It was, after all, Ramsey Yusef, the nephew of Mohammed, that participated in the first attack on the WTC.
Was he the only person involved? Of course not, it was after all part and parcel of multiple attacks on America that occurred via Al Qaeda during the 1990's.

It is pretty amusing that Liberals are so willing to believe conspiracy theories stating that 9/11 was an "inside job" without ANY proof, but are unwilling to admit obvious evidence on the 9/11 plot.

Answer 3

I don't think he said that he was "solely responsible" for the 9/11 attacks. He was the planner for the attacks. Not just on 9/11, either. He did more than that.

Answer 4

Yes, upon confirmation, conservatives will believe a terrorist. That is one reason the officials spend so much time interrogating terrorist, to find new information.

I doubt most will eat it up like ice cream. I believe most will believe he is not telling the truth.

Answer 5

Sure the Repub's are willing to believe a terrorist, after all the Republican administration is supporting known terrorists in Lebenon in order to try and counter Hezbollah who is supported by Iran.

Answer 6

According to the transcripts, he only confessed to being in on the planning. But, it's said he has an inflated ego. He may be lieing just to gain stature among his terrorist butt buddies.

Answer 7

Of course there are others who were involved in the planning. But at least this is one big fish who is no longer in the pond. And that is a good thing.

Answer 8

Only a lib would deny that anyone other than our own government is responsible for the 9/11 attacks, even when the person responsible confesses. Sorry if the TRUTH doesn't support your lame theories but I'm sure that, if you follow the lib handbook and just continue to stidently bellow and talk over others professing your otherworldly theories and crackpot allegations, others of your ilk will join in on your little rant.

Answer 9

I am willing to believe the answers that the terrorist in question gave because they do not exist in a vacuum. His interrogators have information from other sources, too. They know how to interrogate. They are fully aware that the person they are interrogating is trying to lie. Believe me, his answers are checked and cross-checked from other sources and corroborated.

What I don't understand is why you don't believe terrorists when they outright tell you that they fully intend to destroy Israel, Europe and especially the U.S. They tell you what they intend to do, they have a track record of attempts both successful and not successful.


Dude, BELIEVE THEM!!!

Answer 10

I endorse your views !. Security agencies should thoroughlly scan any confession to reach the real culprit.