Has any body heard this idea that at the end of 90 mins if its a draw both teams get a point then there is a penalty shoot out where the winner gets another point. sounds stupid at first but i quite like the idea now i've fought about id what do you think.
2007-03-15 00:03:36 · 11 answers · asked by yttapyido 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
No! who ever wins the pens gets 2 points total. and the loser of pens gets 1 for the draw it just means that 3 points have still gone some where. its just an extra bit at the end of the game if its a draw
2007-03-15 00:16:39 · update #1
I beleive it is that if it is a draw, it goes to a shoot out with the winner getting 2 i dont think the loser gets any... I think it is a bit silly really.. It might work but why change it???
If it aint broke dont fix it...
2007-03-15 00:18:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think its not a bad idea but i dont see why they need to change it.
It may take away a bit of excitement, if your teams drawing with 5 minutes left they may not throw everything forward to try and get all the points, just settle for not getting beat and take the penaty shoot out.
i think its just a gimick to try and get fans back into the grounds, maybe they should lower ticket prices before they start messing with how the leagues are run
2007-03-15 00:54:12 · answer #2 · answered by blue birds til i die 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It's stupid.
The Singapore League tried it for one season some years ago. Many coaches didn't like it, and it was scrapped the next season.
A draw means that both teams are equal. Penalty shootouts are a silly way of deciding a winner.
2007-03-15 00:59:29 · answer #3 · answered by BeN 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's a ridiculous idea, absolutely stupid! Imagine if your team scores a last minute equaliser away from home to make it 1-1 & then you get beat on pens - you'd be gutted.
They experimented with it in the J League a while ago & binned it off cos it was pointless
2007-03-15 01:42:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jay A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first and more suitable, it is no longer the job of close by regulation enforcement to enforce federal regulation. the place will the investment to enforce it come from? Out of the wallet of Nebraskans? no longer honest. 2d, companies and local agengies could and can confirm criminal status of all people who persist with for reward, even in spite of the shown fact that, in basic terms because of the fact somebody has place of work work that seems criminal, does no longer propose it extremely is. employer people and local companies have not have been given any way fo understanding no remember if or no longer the documents they are provided are criminal and not counterfiet, so how plenty burden for verifying can quite be positioned on lay people who're in basic terms attempting to make a livng themselves? it is the subject with those charges.
2016-10-02 04:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by condom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, if it aint broke dont fix it. Seems to me it'll turn the game into some American style circus. I could understand them doing something along those lines in cup games. No. leave the league alone.
2007-03-15 00:27:50 · answer #6 · answered by alan r. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bad idea, it would encourage negative play from poor teams if they knew they could potentially get all 3 points from a shoot out.
2007-03-15 00:09:10 · answer #7 · answered by ben 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Totally agree with 'ben' and im sure 99.99% of people feel the same. It wouldnt encourage attacking play, it would do the reverse.
2007-03-15 03:01:11 · answer #8 · answered by cheekychap432 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why try and change something that is good as it is? if this has got anything to do with the fat idiot blatter i would not be surprised...
2007-03-15 00:23:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leave well alone.
2007-03-17 00:41:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋