Does evolution try to explain the hymen?

Answer 1

Just another thing we have in common with the other mammals.
To Amy-J : perhaps you could explain why we were created with an appendix, coccyx, men with nipples, and women with the afformentioned hymen.
Just curious to see if there is a biblical answer.

Answer 2

optimistic, it would not artwork and there is no longer sufficient evidence to help it. If we clarify it to you, which version ought to we clarify besides for the reason that there is no genuine version (that's rather strange whether that's meant to be a actuality). maximum have confidence that evolution is a metamorphosis over the years in the genetic make up of organisms ensuing in new species and hybrids. that is by using horizontal gene circulate, mutations, interbreeding the place obtainable, etc. The persons of communities with the features (have been given from the genetic alterations) that helps it to produce the main or maximum useful offspring are those whose offspring stay to tell the tale and the subsequent era could have their genes and the weaker/much less perfect ones will die out. provide this technique sufficient time and there must be a great form of species in diverse places in the international. this is of course no longer sufficient element to write down that's medical theory type yet that's it in layman's words. The evidence stated via all the a number of communities with their diverse perspectives on evolution incorporate fossils that resemble particular platforms on diverse species, the deeper layers of the earth have less difficult fossils at the same time as the floor layers have very complicated fossils, comparable genes between diverse species, comparable embryos between species and then there is plenty that's no longer agreed on via maximum folk of evolution followers, yet this is extensively quoted as evidence for it surprisingly whilst it comprises micro organism and genetics.

Answer 3

I don't know what biologists say but here's one possibility based on natural selection:

people want their children, thus their genetic information, to have the best chance of survival possible.

while a human couple may cooperate in making their offspring survive, the best strategy for choosing a mate with this survival in mind is different for men and women.

On the one hand, women know all their offspring are their own. They choose a mate who will best contribute to their survival, by providing for them. It is not necessary that the man be all that young, simply that he provide until the offspring are viable.

Men, on the other hand, have no guarantee that their offspring are their own, and their mate will only produce offspring till a certain age.

To get the best chance of surviving offspring, men are attracted more to younger women, because they will reproduce longer.

Likewise, because a man can't know his offspring are his own and not another man's (his mate could cheat), evolution makes men want assurance that their mate won't fool around. I'm not sure if it's proven, but a woman with less sexual experience may be less likely to do so than one with more. It seems sensible that men would consider the virgin woman the ideal offspring-producing mate, if this is true.

This would mean that men who were partial to young women as close to virgin as possible would have the evolutionary advantage, and would seek out and choose such women as mates.

Now if so, then the most viable, successful men would especially tend toward this choice, as their best option, and since they can best compete for them. Turning back to women, who want these choice men to mate with and provide for their offspring, how can they beat out the other women and get these men to choose them?

To prove to these choice men that they are the kind of young virgin women the men are after.

The hymen could simply function as such proof, unintended by nature, perhaps a mutation tens of millenia ago, but favored by natural selection nonetheless. Of course, it can't provide advantage to women now since they all are born with them and have equal chance to use its potential advantage. Ever since all women started being born with hymens, certainly long, long ago, it has had no effect on evolution at all. But when it appeared for the first time, it may well have provided an advantage in selection, and eventually the genes that produced it outsurvived the genes of women who didn't have it.

Answer 4

Ahem.

Most mammals have a joining tissue barrier in the vagina to prevent infection until the time that menses starts, when blood flow can cleanse the internal area of possible bacteria.

Since humans are mammals, it follows that this structure should be see in us, and indeed it is although it is very much more develped in humans than other land animals. Thck hymesn are found in aquatic mammals, which begs the question why humans have such a well-developed one.

Answer 5

Only Buckingham Palace cares about the hymen. For heaven's sake I hope William and what's her name have some fun while they are young!

Answer 6

evolution is BS
so pleez don't fall into that trap.
1.) how did the universe begin...
um "maybe' there were microspecies of algea that formed in the seas?
2.) oh really?
where did they come from
and those and those?
3.) how the h did the big bang happen on it's own?

sorry just think about it....
lol
good luck
Evolution tries to explain everything but has a lot of mistakes and shortcomings everywhere
but ne way have a nice day
sorry I probably sounded really mean