I am tired of people posting sources at wikipedia.
Anyone else?
2007-03-14 22:10:38 · 5 answers · asked by tom t 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikireality
I think you should follow this link and define Wkireality b4 someone else does!
2007-03-14 22:15:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. At least people can follow the links to Wikipedia and check out the source. If you cite a source in a printed book, the questioner is far less likely to follow up on it.
2007-03-14 22:14:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see any problem with this. Wikipedia is a great source of information and if it is better able to explain an answer to a question, I'll source it.
2007-03-14 22:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by Stupidog 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what source is better, free, safe + trusted, and relatively complete? if someone asks a question that is most easily answered by perusing wikipedia, then perhaps they don't know about wikipedia.
perhaps that is what yahoo answers is for; to tell people about wikipedia. and to save the christians from their religion.
2007-03-14 22:17:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know it's cheap, but I have done it.
2007-03-14 22:13:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋