English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed to his role in 9/11 and other attacks. The hearing was held at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The transcript says he was responsible for, including the Richard Reid shoe bomber attempt to blow up an airliner over the Atlantic Ocean, the Bali nightclub bombing in Indonesia, the 1993 World Trade Center attack and other attacks that were foiled.

2007-03-14 19:18:15 · 5 answers · asked by SadBastard 1 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

The guy might have been just ranting or bragging while being held by the US. I don't know if I believe it until they present more evidence instead of just one guy's words. Remember that WMD thing also came from just one guy('Curveball') who is known to tell lies.

But, it sure makes hella of a catch though if they really did catch the guy who planned gazillion terror attacks as they claim.

Either Pentagon really made great catch or they're just suckers who got suckered by smartazz Khalid.

2007-03-14 19:55:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Taliban is a pretty well structured organization. According to some in positions with titles, the Taliban killed Christ. Could be true. If that man did everything that he is alleged to by claim or by accusation, then Carlos 'The Jackal',was an amateur.
I stopped the attack on Spruce Goose, that was a plane that Howard Hues flew. Then I planned an attack on the moon , Crater 6 on the Dark Side is not religuos enough for my church.It was foiled.
He might be a bad man, he might be crazy as loony toons. Way this game is being played out Taliban did EVERYTHING bad, al kienda helped.

2007-03-15 03:45:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I always suspect anything the government documents as being neccessarily true or false.. I used to work for DoD LOL

2007-03-15 02:23:10 · answer #3 · answered by darchangel_3 5 · 0 0

no. our current administration has proven that they are not interested in full disclosure. for themselves i mean. the patriot act, after all, cannot be turned against them. damnit.

2007-03-15 02:37:26 · answer #4 · answered by jljljljljljljljljljl 2 · 1 0

Notice any footprints lying around?
If there is then it must be true.

2007-03-15 03:25:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers