What makes Niccolo Machiavelli different from other thinkers and philosophers?

Question

I need ur answers ASAP please. Thanks! =)

Answer 1

His thing was behind the scenes manipulation, of people, towns and cities.

He said. Why sit on the throne when you can rule from behind it safe from attack.

Most thinkers and philosopher contemplated life or tried to find ways to bring people together, or destroy them (Sun Tzu)

But Niccolo wanted to control life and treat those who live it like pieces on a chess board.

He was the Master of what he did, that is what made him different.

Answer 2

Niccolo Machiavelli thinks as what stone-hearted philosophers do. Other philosophers are recognize by their practical, natural and scientific philosophies. In his case, he was recognized by his unfair philosophies in his book, "The Prince". He was very different from the others. He thinks like a dictator. Yet, his name is published in many philosophy or history books... Saying that no good leader should be bounded by law was a really not good idea. I mean, how could he think of that? All people cannot resist temptations... There will always be weak points in every person here in this world. Even the the best leader can be a dictator. But he was right at some times.... a good and very disciplined leader can unite people in a country. A leader must use coercion when needed for national unity when the citizens are too disobedient.

Answer 3

For one thing, Machiavelli wasn't concerned with huge philosophical and ethical issues of life and death right and wrong. His most influential book "the Prince" deals with the altogether pragmatic methods of governance.

His advice on leadership works because it is brutal honest and has one simple end point, getting and retaining power.

Machiavelli writes from the point of view of how people are, not how they ought to be. he is one tough cookie and anyone who reads him profits.

Answer 4

It does seem which you DO think of like a actuality seeker for the reason which you have no longer taken what's in the past you at face fee and you're looking deeper and utilising serious thinking and thinking. The very way you have posed this question illuminates this actuality approximately you - despite the fact that English isn't your first language. you probably did o.k. in asking and that i wish you proceed. As a actuality seeker, you do no longer ought to have a attitude as a undertaking is presented - you would be able to evolve you recommendations, concepts and concepts. Keenness in remark is a good potential to have, yet extra importantly is your skill to attain that what you word is a controversy of attitude. in case you ought to replace attitude you would be extra open to the wealth of threat in attitude and produce a properly-rounded attitude to others which you communicate philosophy with. No apology mandatory, is become a properly formulated question. maximum those that talk English as their many times happening language communicate in textual content textile (txt) at the instant.

Answer 5

It seems that Machiavelli really had no political commitments or political stripe: he seems to have been on nobody's side politically. It seems that either he was ruthlessly ambitious or believed in serving in government no matter what political group or party was in charge. They imprisoned and tortured him in 1513 and eventually banished him to his country estate at San Casciano (all this torture and imprisonment, however, didn't stop him from trying to get in good with the Medicis). It was during his exile in San Casciano, when he was desparate to get back into government, that he wrote his principle works: the Discourse on Livy , The Prince , The History of Florence , and two plays. Many of these works, such as The Prince , were written for the express purpose of getting a job in the Medici government.

The tremendous innovation of both the Discourses on Livy and The Prince was Machiavelli's uncoupling of political theory from ethics. Throughout the Western tradition, then, politics had been understood in terms of right and wrong, just and unjust, temperate and intemperate, and so on.

In many ways you could consider Machiavelli to be the first major Western thinker to apply the strictly scientific method of Aristotle and Averroes to politics. For Machiavelli, politics was about one and only one thing: getting and keeping power or authority.

The social and political world of the The Prince is monstrously unpredictable and volatile; only the most superhuman calculative mind can overcome this social and political volatility.

Throughout The Prince and the Discourses , it's clear that Machiavelli has praise only for the winners. For this reason, he admires figures such as Alexander VI and Julius II, universally hated throughout Europe as ungodly popes, for thei astonishing military and political success. His refusal to allow ethical judgements enter into political theory branded him throughout the Renaissance as a kind of anti-Christ. In chapters such as "Whether a Prince Should Be True to his Word," Machiavelli argues that any moral judgment should be secondary to getting, increasing and maintaining power. The answer to the above question, for instance, is "it's good to be true to your word, but you should lie whenever it advances your power or security—not only that, it's necessary."

It might help to understand Machiavelli to imagine that he's not talking about the state so much in ethical terms but in medical terms. In talking about seditious points of view, Machiavelli doesn't make an ethical argument, but rather a medical one—"seditious people should be amputated before they infect the whole state."

The single most articulated value in the work of Machiavelli is virtú (Latin virtus), which is related to our word, "virtue." Machiavelli means it more in its Latin sense of "manly," but individuals with virtú are primarily marked by their ability to enforce their will on volatile social situations. They do this through a combination of strong will, strength, and brilliant and strategic calculation.

When Guilio de'Medici left Firenze to become Pope Clement VII, the subalterns that he left in charge of the city managed it very poorly. Machiavelli saw his chance and tried to get a position in the new republic, but the new rulers distrusted him because of his long association with the Medici. Three years after the death of Machiavelli and two years before the publication of The Prince , , the state that Machiavelli worked so hard to help and believed so much in blinked out of existence.

Answer 6

"the means justify the ends"... his mind was placed on one goal, Power. How to achieve, how to maintain and how to use it, not for the good of the people but for the good of whom had it.

He had a keen mind and way of thinking, very precise and pragmatic. He was capable to learn from the errors and success' of others.

Answer 7

Shares a name with the best West Coast rapper Tupac; Makavelli.