No. BUT, goals against average is based on a 60 minute game. So if you pull the goalie, he is playing less than a game and the goals against goes up. Not too much a difference, but a difference. But say you are down 5-3 so pull the goalie with 2 minutes left. G.A. would be 5.17 not 5.
2007-03-14 19:10:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by JuanB 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
No. If you take Wednesday night's Nashville/Detroit gamesheet from NHL.com, you see that Detroit had 35 shots for the game, but one of them went into the empty net on Kirk Maltby's goal, so in a way, "EMPTY NET" is listed as another goalie on the sheet. Still, as stated in one of the above replies, the goals that did go in on Mason get normalized over 60 minutes when calculating goals against average.
I'm looking for someone to ask whether a shot that hits the post or crossbar is a shot on goal. It's not.
2007-03-14 23:27:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by wackomann 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. How could it? Who is the Goaltender that it should be counted against? He's not there!
2007-03-14 19:50:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by clueless_nerd 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it doesn't if you look at goalie or team stats they will give you the goals against for the goalies and in another coloum you'll see eng empty net goals there in brackets usally
2007-03-15 04:02:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by thekid_6900 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It does show up in their stats as ENG (empty net goal), but doesn't figure in the GAA.
2007-03-15 06:59:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kainoa 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No the goalie is not on the ice to try to stop it so they can't really hold that agaisnt them!
2007-03-14 18:38:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No sir.
2007-03-15 08:04:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by lazyjbob 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
2007-03-15 08:32:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by brian57 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They do not.
2007-03-14 18:32:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by alwaysmoose 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, they don't.
2007-03-15 08:03:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋