Blacks "were 7 times more likely than whites to commit homicide in 1998"
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/ra...
Blacks are four times more likely than Whites to kill their children
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/ki...
28% of black males go to jail, vs. 4.4% of White males
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm...
68.7% of blacks are born out of wedlock
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/pdf/nvsr...
62% of ALL black births are paid for by the US government
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/datawh/statab/pu...
Blacks are responsible for 40.8% of all domestic violence cases, despite being only 13% of the population.
See page 28:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/vi....
Though only 12% of the population, blacks take 38.3% of the total of all welfare payments. Whites are 72% of the population, and take 30.5% of the total.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/vi....
Though only 12% of the population, blacks take 38% of taxpayer-subsidized housing
http://www.huduser.org/datasets/***...96...
JOURNAL OF BLACKS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
http://www.jbhe.com/
But income alone does not explain the racial scoring gap. Consider these facts:
Whites from families with incomes of less than $10,000 had a mean SAT score of 980. This is 123 points higher than the national mean for all blacks.
Whites from families with incomes below $10,000 had a mean SAT test score that was 46 points higher than blacks whose families had incomes of between $80,000 and $100,000.
Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 142 points below the mean score for whites from families at the same income level.
The disparity in interracial murder rates is astounding. For every 100,000 White people, how many do you think kill blacks? And for every 100,000 negroes, how many do think kill Whites? Let's find out...
Kill ratios Averaged for Five Years
Year Black on White White on Black
1994 1306 469
1995 1110 454
1996 1077 417
1997 974 343
1998 839 362
------------------------------...
Total 5306 2045
Average 1061.2 409
White Population in *thousands*
1998 - 223,001
1997 - 221,317
1996 - 219,623
1995 - 218,010
1994 - 216,365
------------------
Total 1,098,316,000
Average 219,663,200
Black Population in *thousands*
1998 - 34,431
1997 - 33,973
1996 - 33,518
1995 - 33,098
1994 - 32,654
------------------
Total 167,674,000
Average 33,534,800
Black average of White murders / Black average population per 100,000
1061 / 33,534,800 x 100,000 = 3.16
White average of Black murders / White average population per 100,000
409 / 219,663,200 x 100,000 = 0.186
3.16/0.186 = 16.99
BLACKS ARE 17 TIMES (1700%) MORE LIKELY TO KILL WHITES THAN WHITES ARE TO KILL BLACKS
So, do you think the ratios are insignificant? What if White people killed blacks at the same rate that blacks killed whites??
Let x = dead negroes killed between 1994-2003
x / 219,663,000 x 100,000 = 3.16
x = (3.16)(219,663,000) / 100,000
x = 6941 per year
6941 x 10 years = 69,410 dead negroes
This is over TEN THOUSAND MORE DEATHS THAN WERE SUFFERED BY AMERICANS DURING THE ENTIRE VIET NAM WAR.
Sources:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/ov...
http://www.census.gov/population/es.../i...
Liberals often try to blame Black violence on poverty. The Census data, however, disproves that hypothesis. How? In 1995, among the American poor, there were 16.3 million Whites (real ones), 10.0 million Blacks, 8.6 million "Hispanics," and 1.4 million Asians. Blacks comprised about 27.6% of the American poor. Those poverty numbers can be verified at http://www.census.gov/population/es.../i...
http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/pov95...
During that year, Blacks committed about 54% of all US murders. Remember that the FBI, from whom the murder information comes, counts "Hispanics" as "Whites," making the total number of poor persons eligible to be committing murders as "Whites" about 24.8 million. These "Whites" comprised 68.5% of the American poor, but committed - at most - only 46% of 1995 US murders, if we make the doubtful assumption that Asians and Amerindians committed none. The evidence argues against the liberal hypothesis that poverty causes crime.
Rape is an economic crime if liberals are willing to admit that women are merchandise or "goods", and that men are compelled to take them because they're impoverished, and not criminal scum.
See page 10 - http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/pov95...
The racial distribution of arrestees for rape is similar to the racial distribution for all violent UCR arrests ¾ 56% of arrestees for rape in 1995 were white, 42% were black, and 2% were of other races.
The population of all races - approx. 275,617,000
White 226,563,000
Black 35,392,000
226,563,000/275,617,000 = 82.2% of Whites in America
35,392,000/275,617,000 = 12.8% of Blacks in America
Child abuse- Sexual All types Sexual Total
Whites 64.8% 54.8% 17,978 139,480
Blacks 19.2% 30.8% 5,399 78,339
Sources:
http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb...s9...
White total child abuse per 100,000: 139,480/2265.63 = 61.6
Black total child abuse per 100,000: 78,339/353.92 = 221.4
Now let's divide the smaller White rate into the larger black rate to get a comparison: 221.4/61.6 = 3.6
***Blacks are 3.6 times MORE LIKELY to abuse their children then Whites.***
White sexual child abuse per 100,000 (226,563,000/100,000 = 2265.63): 17,978/2265.63 = 7.94
Black sexual child abuse per 100,000 (35,392,000/100,000 = 353.92): 5399/353.92 = 15.25
Now let's divide the smaller White rate into the larger black rate to get a comparison: 15.25/7.94 = 1.9
***Blacks are 1.9 times MORE LIKELY to sexually abuse their children than Whites.***
That's why.
2007-03-16 03:36:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by joshnya68 4
·
0⤊
1⤋