English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-14 14:32:04 · 21 answers · asked by J D M 1 in Sports Football (American)

21 answers

For every winner, there is a loser I guess. That's a really odd questions because I look at it like, there are 31 crappy teams in the league when it's all over after the Super Bowl, and every year, somebody has to be last, 2nd to last, and so on. Not every team can go 16-0, somebody's got to come in last...

2007-03-14 14:46:14 · answer #1 · answered by Carolina Kitten 6 · 0 0

There are so many "Sucky" teams in the NFL because there isn't enough good coaches.. and players coming into the league are getting better.. so i think there will be a change.. epically dis guy named Calvin Johnson from Ga Tech.. yea and also Brady Quinn, and lots of others, but any team can change in just a years time.. including the Raiders and the ever so good Cardinals and oh yea... the Great FALCONS.. but the Ravens still my team!

2007-03-14 21:45:17 · answer #2 · answered by imdamancc 1 · 0 0

Well, in Oakland's case, the owner Al Davis is not prepared to spend the money to bring in solid players. When it comes to Houston, there have no offensive line. Most bad teams have starting quarterback problems. However, the biggest problem is that key players want to join a team that has a legitiamate shot at a Superbowl. You don't sign a contract with a losing team. That's why the rebuilding process takes so long in the NFL. You have to build a new team when you are that bad.

2007-03-14 21:39:01 · answer #3 · answered by oni_link_04 5 · 0 0

If every team was managed the same the NFL, or any league for that matter would be unwatchable. in the NFL you have some bad teams on the rise. Teams like the Raiders, who are in denial about their state, will continue to be at the bottom. Same for baseball with teams like the Tampa Bay Devil Rays. The only difference is Oakland's investing too much money in troubled talents like Randy Moss, and Porter. While Tampa Bay's not spending any money.

2007-03-19 13:39:12 · answer #4 · answered by stonez022 2 · 0 0

there are alot of bad teams. But you have to look at who's in the rebuilding stage and who's not. Whos has done a good job of consistently getting top quality players to replace other players. at some point players get old, slow, or whatever and you always need to be finding new talent. The NFL is the best of all the rest in terms on quality. Not everyone can win. Especially with all the talent there is.

2007-03-19 00:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by spiritius4 2 · 0 0

It's all due to the Salary Cap and the way players are all about the money. If they weren't so greedy the team they play for could afford to put superstars with superstars. ie.. the 90's cowboys. The only players that really understand this are Peyton and Harrison... They restructured their contracts twice to be payed less so that the team can afford Wayne and Clark etc...

2007-03-15 01:02:59 · answer #6 · answered by Eric L 1 · 0 0

i always thought there was too much change...if you look at the college teams that keep their coaches and dont have a lot of transfers...they dominate, cuz they have the same guys...its continuity...too many teams pull the trigger before even giving a guy a chance...look at the steelers...bill cowher had a mega tenure with them, and they had there ups and downs, but are one of the winniest teams in history...look at miami...they at one point had 4 coaches (and had the best winning percentage in the history of the NFL and most wins)...Wilson, Shula, Johnson, and Wannstadt...then when they fell apart...theyve had 3 new coaches in the past 4 years...and look at em, they couldnt walk right if their life depended on it...anyway, to answer the question, there isnt enough continuity and teams arent teams but just a bunch of guys playing football

2007-03-14 21:42:37 · answer #7 · answered by jtfehr28 2 · 0 0

I personally think it is because we have these four or five teams each season that have the best players and they usually have close to perfect seasons. When this happens, somebody has to be losing agaisnt these teams. Its not that the teams suck, their just not as good as some of the other teams in the league.

2007-03-21 22:58:40 · answer #8 · answered by jscorpiox 2 · 0 0

Too many teams are counting their chickens before they hatch. Maybe there is not enough great coaching and training staffs. I dont know, but the dude before me is right- "someone has to lose."

2007-03-14 21:38:12 · answer #9 · answered by nate d 2 · 0 0

They really are not sucky, free agency has just made them more equal

2007-03-21 07:56:51 · answer #10 · answered by franksr57 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers