English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How the American brands in other countries hurt American images??
In another way, I want to have some opinions about what negative cultural globalization effects affect the America.

Thanks......

2007-03-14 13:52:10 · 2 answers · asked by ryan 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

2 answers

Two ways come to mind. First is to take a look at the advertising used to sell products, we use sex to promote everything from car tires to frozen pizza. Secondly, by pushing our commercial products (and essentially our lifestyle and values) onto other societies some people feel we are helping to change and destroy foreign cultures and traditions; needless to say some people are offended and want American influence out of their country.

2007-03-18 12:33:03 · answer #1 · answered by Ashley 4 · 0 0

Palin will in all probability run for Senate from Alaska, hoping to get Ted Stevens seat-- the single he lost while convicted of corruption. that's, if the Alaskan State Senate's bipartisan committee's corruption costs against her do no longer finally end up sticking. She'll have problem working for US nationwide place of work, i think, because of the fact of her husband's former energetic club interior the Alaskan Independence occasion-- the AIP is an anti-American occasion that needs Alaska to secede from the Union. Sarah Palin, jointly as governor, taped a favorable speech to be shown at their convention-- a video that's useful to get shown many times back by way of whoever she runs against. She does have adventure with tax handouts-- each twelve months, each Alaskan gets a large verify from oil sales. that's no longer viewed welfare, of direction-- welfare is while the government provides money to those who're undesirable and dealing with starvation and homelessness. that's in basic terms a classic government handout, of the form that often is going to those who make large political donations or have lobbyists-- such because of the fact the vast Montana ranchers attending to feed their privately-owned livestock on taxpayer-owned grasslands, as an occasion, and positively to no longer be perplexed with welfare. Welfare is for undesirable human beings, and is undesirable. Taxpayer money or sources going to prosperous donors is 'enterprise as standard', and good. In her credit, I could desire to confess that interior the whole time she replaced into mayor of the 6000 human beings of Wasilla, or for the time of her 2 years as governor of Alaska (inhabitants, 670,053-- with regard to the comparable as Columbus, Ohio), neither replaced into ever overrun by way of Russian troops. apart from, no longer in basic terms like the Bush administration, she curiously DID safeguard her southern borders, the two one in all Wasilla and Alaska, from those unlawful Canadian migrant workers and terrorists. the two one in all those element to adventure that many politicians can no longer, or maybe won't, admit to, and could stand her in good stead could desire to she run for President in 2012.

2016-10-02 03:35:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers