Would'nt be worth the paper it was written on.The torturer probably dictated the whole statement.The people who extract these confessions are fiends and lackeys of thier masters.
2007-03-14 16:22:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Less than zero. Even those who are experts in torture (and that is a very odd thing to major in at college) readily admit that whatever information is garnered from torture is compromised at best.
2007-03-14 15:29:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Experto Credo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Was he actually tortured? Can you prove this? If not, then you are making a false allegation, which is, inherently and patently, a lie. You may want to reword it so that it says that you suspect he was tortured.
I'm not saying he wasn't tortured. I just want proof of it, before I go along with this.
2007-03-14 13:46:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
it depends on how long the torture is. if it takes a long time then its a lie to stop your torture. but if its within a reasonable amount of time then i would take it as true.
2007-03-14 13:38:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Riddles 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Depends on the skill of the torturer!
2007-03-14 13:48:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
A lot actually. In fact THE lot. There is nothing like a good slap to wake up the brain - as they say in Africa. Ask that one - Tsvangirai
2007-03-14 13:38:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by K. Marx iii 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Usually I don't give it much credibility. It depends on who is talking.
2007-03-14 13:37:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
For prosecution, not much. For stopping an imminent threat, quite a bit.
2007-03-14 13:38:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by ML 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
None. Anyone will say anything to make the sick, twisted know it alls stop.
2007-03-14 13:56:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Williamstown 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
zero anyone with any sense whatsoever know that this information isnt reliable.
2007-03-14 13:36:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋