Agree/Disagree?

Question

“Competition is a destructive force in society.”

Agree/Disagree +reasons

Answer 1

I can't say "agree all the time" or "disagree all the time." Like the first poster said, sometimes competition can motivate people to achieve more.

However, it can also motivate people to commit dishonest and/or violent acts.

Competition is like a double-edged knife, and whether it works for good or for ill depends upon who wields it and their motives.

Answer 2

Disagree - The meaning of life, to some people at least, is competition. Without it, businesses would be monopolies and only monopolies. Games would never be played to their fullest. Without competition, there's no adrenaline at the last leg of the race. Competition singlehandedly might as well have constructed society, because without it no one would have motivation or a reason to try to go on or succeed.

Answer 3

Yes, it is.

People should be working together to achieve positive gains, and not against one another. Furthermore, they should not be working together to do others out. No overall gain can be attained when people work at balancing their yin and yang and carry on like someone has to rob Peter in order to give more to Paul (or vice versa). This "it's me or you attitude" seems to be very commonplace today. Possibly Far Eastern civilizations and North Amercian aboriginal populations have exercised a more co-operative way of life and mentality than European civilizations.

I think that a lot of what we are led to believe is fair competition is actually dishonest e.g. scandals associated with the Olympics. I feel that more attention needs to be paid to transactions that go on behind closed doors under a veil of secrecy or under oaths of secrecy.

It could maybe be a motivating force if exercised in an appropriate manner, however. However, it also mitvates people to cheat and to become liars.

Answer 4

Disagree - competition is what keeps us growing. It reminds us that if we are not willing to give it 100%, there is always another person who is.

Look at any business. Take the fast food industry for example. People choose which restaurants to go to. The better the restaurant, the more people visit it, which in turn makes more profit, which in turn grows the restaurant.

I want the very best, so Im going to choose the best. Then the best becomes better. It keeps society growing.

Answer 5

I disagree. Unrestrained competition could be destructive but healthy competition leads to improvement and innovation. Just as anecdotal example, my six year old's learning increases by leaps and bounds when she is in a classroom setting and has other children to compete against. If I tried to home school her, she'd be ten before she learned her alphabet.

Answer 6

Disagree, because without competition you have no reason to strive because everything is given to you

Answer 7

Agree and Disagree.

Competition destroys the object it desires.
Like competing pack of animals fighting over a piece of meat, but by destroying the object, their force becomes better.

It is our inner nature to be competitive.

Answer 8

I suppose context matters, but in general I disagree. Without competition we don't improve. In terms of the economy, think monopoly.

Answer 9

Ill posed question. Competition is the obverse of cooperation. We, as humans, were evolved to do both. Perhaps you had some other race of beings in mind?

Answer 10

nationwide protection Make securing our borders against a obtainable terrorist possibility the acceptable protection precedence. no person that seeks to do us injury could desire to be allowed to bypass the border into U.S. territory. regardless of each thing, a protection coverage could desire to benefit people who actual pay for it: the american human beings. Re-concentration the efforts of our militia and intelligence amenities on finding those people who planned the terrorist assaults on the U.S. and who stay at large. It could desire to be made sparkling that united statesa. can't be attacked with impunity. when I voted for the authorization to apply rigidity against people who attacked us in 2001, i did no longer think of that we'd be getting slowed down for years in a united states of america-construction workout in Afghanistan jointly as the perpetrators stay at large. Efforts in that portion of the international could desire to be solely concentrated on apprehending those in charge for the assaults against united statesa.. Push for a complete overhaul of U.S. intelligence standards and applications. for plenty too long, Congress has operated decrease than the thought merely spending greater on the intelligence community might make it greater effective and effective. we've regrettably discovered the difficult way that that's no longer a clever mindset. I even have consulted with dissimilar contemporary and previous intelligence experts with regard to the could desire to re-examine our intelligence community and how it is going to function, and that i will take action to enforce such reforms as president. privateness and private liberty Ron Paul: I even have fought this combat for some years. I subsidized a invoice to overturn the Patriot Act and function gained some victories, yet on the instant the possibility on your liberty and privateness is amazingly genuine. we choose management on the acceptable which will forestall Washington from centralizing potential and private records approximately our lives. Iraq that's now time to deliver our troops abode. We could desire to return our concentration to finding bin weighted down and making useful that we are able to be arranged for any destiny threats against our nationwide protection.