I think this goes back to male supremacy doctrines. Females were not even recorded in ancient biblical writings, Jesus in the New Testament did openly converse with a woman in public. This was not allowed in those times. Women were not allowed in the marketplace alone......women were treated as property and still are in some cultures.
2007-03-14 13:15:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by margherita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only a male child can carry the surname. So, they do not want to lose the generation.
2007-03-14 13:04:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by St Harpy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
each and every concept has a 50% probability of the two being a male or woman. I won't bypass into element with regards to the biology of all of it (we would be right here all night). in case you like extra help, do a Punnett sq. with XX and XY alleles.
2016-10-18 09:53:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To carry on the family name...
2007-03-14 13:03:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by El Tigre 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Becasue they can carry on the family name is my best guess.
2007-03-14 13:05:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by foxfire 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are only alowed one baby -so a girl will not leave a name--pray for them to come to Jesus and be born again-there is a multi million underground church there now -but it is persecuted while meeting in peoples homes. John 3 repented and born again
2007-03-14 13:05:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
well it's not only in china you know...i mean what family doesn't want a kid to carry the family name?
2007-03-14 13:04:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
so that he will (hopefully) provide for them in their old age, as any daughter will have been married and with her husbands family.
2007-03-14 13:07:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by fodigie2004 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they think females are inferior to men
2007-03-14 13:05:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by alexsparkle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋