English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

I think this goes back to male supremacy doctrines. Females were not even recorded in ancient biblical writings, Jesus in the New Testament did openly converse with a woman in public. This was not allowed in those times. Women were not allowed in the marketplace alone......women were treated as property and still are in some cultures.

2007-03-14 13:15:54 · answer #1 · answered by margherita 4 · 0 0

Only a male child can carry the surname. So, they do not want to lose the generation.

2007-03-14 13:04:58 · answer #2 · answered by St Harpy 6 · 1 0

each and every concept has a 50% probability of the two being a male or woman. I won't bypass into element with regards to the biology of all of it (we would be right here all night). in case you like extra help, do a Punnett sq. with XX and XY alleles.

2016-10-18 09:53:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To carry on the family name...

2007-03-14 13:03:40 · answer #4 · answered by El Tigre 3 · 1 0

Becasue they can carry on the family name is my best guess.

2007-03-14 13:05:04 · answer #5 · answered by foxfire 5 · 0 0

they are only alowed one baby -so a girl will not leave a name--pray for them to come to Jesus and be born again-there is a multi million underground church there now -but it is persecuted while meeting in peoples homes. John 3 repented and born again

2007-03-14 13:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

well it's not only in china you know...i mean what family doesn't want a kid to carry the family name?

2007-03-14 13:04:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

so that he will (hopefully) provide for them in their old age, as any daughter will have been married and with her husbands family.

2007-03-14 13:07:14 · answer #8 · answered by fodigie2004 4 · 0 0

they think females are inferior to men

2007-03-14 13:05:06 · answer #9 · answered by alexsparkle 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers