The external offers no protection as far as encryption, and it will be much much slower. It probably wont have enough space either.
2007-03-14 12:47:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jason B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. A virus, hacker, other illicit act or even a power surge can easily destroy an external hard drive just as it would a native hard drive.
2. Tape backups have a longer storage life than hard drives and, in some studies, have shown a better record of maintaining data integrity.
3. If something mechanically goes wrong with the drive (bad sectors, head misalignment) it will destroy the platter and its data, leaving you with a costly recovery. Tapes are not prone to this problem.
2007-03-14 19:57:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by MrSparkle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tape drives can be unreliable. Actually, the tapes have a high failure rate. An external hard drive is probably the safest archival option right now.
I found a hard drive from 1999 and it still worked. and it was rolling around inside my desk for 8 years.
2007-03-14 19:49:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by John K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you get a proper external drive, then yes, it can be a sufficient backup device. I recommend Western Digital's My Book 1TB (1000GB) Edition. It features RAID, and a triple interface (USB, FireWire 400, and FireWire 800).
2007-03-14 19:50:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Big Q 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I f i had to choose one or the other it would be the HDD
2007-03-14 20:38:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Techman2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋