should george w bush be impeached?

Answer 1

I'd say yes! As to why? Well look at his record of governing for the past 6 yrs. & counting. Heck, they tried to put President Bill Clinton through it, just for lying that he didn't have sexual relations with that woman,(Monika Lewinsky), or was it the "White Water thing", which acquitted the Clintons?
On top of that we now discover some of the key finger- pointers in the Republican Party admit to having an affair at the same time of the Clinton/Lewinsky cafuffle! Can anyone say HYPOCRITE without breaking into laughter?

Answer 2

Impeach GW? Hell no, then we'll be left with Cheney, and who in their right mind would want that?

Take the time to think things thoroughly.

As for GW:

well...he should have been elected by the people in the first place. Otherwise, he would have never been elected for a second term.

I bet he'll challenge the two term limit, claiming he was appointed for the first term, so therefore he should be free to be rightfully elected for another term - as that would become his second term to which he was elected, not appointed.


.

Answer 3

He's done enough damage to our country.....impeaching him would just make things worse.

My opinion.....just wait him out and hope he doesn't do too much more damage.

I feel sorry for whoever is our next President....Rep. or Dem.

Answer 4

Yes , Yes , Yes. He is soooo dumb. Look what he has done to Americans. Now the entire world hates us. Most Americans disagree with his policies

Answer 5

Yes.
GQ magazine actually has an excellent set of "articles of impeachment" for Cheney, but it pretty much applies to W as well. I'd say we should impeach them both. You don't have to read the article (link below). How about this for a short list:
1) Torture
2) Illegal Wiretapping
3) Illegal war based on lies

Answer 6

No, absolutely not!!

President Bush is one of the good guys. He's got a pair of balls and a Texas attitude that you liberal A/Holes just don't comprehend. Go strap on an F-16 like he has and you may just get a glimmer of what he's really like.

So soon you all forget, or is it you are just too young to remember. Saddam brought death and destruction down on himself.

For years, he arrogantly told the UN to go to Hell. He was given numerous chances over several years to allow full inspections for WMD's. He would not allow full and complete inspections. During all that time, I think he moved the weapons he had to Syria or buried them in the Iraqi desert. He did not think anyone had the balls to finally give him an ultimatum and follow through with military action if he did not comply with the UN sanctions. After 9/11, he gambled wrong. 9/11 changed the playing field on a world scale. Also if Colin Powell had not stopped General Norman Schwarzkopf during the Kuwaiti conflict, this last conflict would not have been necessary. You need to understand that we are at war, and thank God, our Military, and our President for making the hard decisions it takes to keep conflicts overseas and not in our streets.

Answer 7

YES Alittle late but why not

Answer 8

Yes. He is responsible for how many deaths now? Then what's left of him should be shipped over to Iraq so he can go through what every American soldier has had to endure due
to his stupidity!

Answer 9

No, that would take too long. Someone needs to @#$% his $%^&.

And Cheney's, too, or he'd end up pres.

Answer 10

YES!

He caused a lot of harm to our country. Basically, what he did can be qualified as treason.