2007-03-14 11:50:43 · 7 answers · asked by Part Time Cynic 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes of course, otherwise those who rent feel like migrants. They face eviction within two months. This should be extended to a year for a sense of security.
2007-03-15 03:51:31 · answer #1 · answered by I'm Sparticus 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
'Rights' that word again.
If you lease or rent something you should read the contract carefully, your 'rights' are contained therein. If you don't like the terms. feel they are exploitative them the market forces will provide you with alternatives. If there is insufficient supply then you those that can meet the terms or are less 'choosy' will get the best options.
Always a difficulty as many of us then fall between two stalls.
Not enough to meet the terms, too much to get state help.
Been there, done that, and paid for the factory that makes the tee shirts!
Tough, pick yourself up, dust yourself down and get on with it.
learn and don't burn in the future.
2007-03-20 19:06:03 · answer #2 · answered by noeusuperstate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, if you are a private tenant you are leasing time on another individuals personal possession. What would happen if he wanted to sell it, after all it is his and therefore he is entitled to do what he wants with it. He pays the mortgage on it. Just the same as you would want to do with your own house. If this were the case you would find that not so many people would be prepared to let.
2007-03-14 19:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by The BudMiester 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes they are paying there rent the same as every one else the only difference is that they are paying more
2007-03-22 17:41:14 · answer #4 · answered by Granny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
2007-03-14 18:57:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yep.
2007-03-14 18:59:01 · answer #6 · answered by frank S 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No
2007-03-21 06:42:00 · answer #7 · answered by ANDREW J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋