I think his rating will be at or above his career high, but more because Maroney looks like to be a much better pass catcher than advertised. Those are high percentage plays, that he and Faulk will cash in on regularly. Dillon wasn't much good for that.
Losing Graham hurts a little, but Watson is a monster. Kyle Brady is a journeyman, but he'll do for a year.
Welker is kind of a shrimp, so I don't get that signing so much. But, they made it work in the past with the likes of Bethel Johnson and Troy Brown.
2007-08 Season, Tom Brady = 93.4 Rating, 3712 Yards, 30 TD, 14 INT, Pro Bowl.
2007-03-14 12:27:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's scary how many kick returners the Patriots field on a given day. That said, I think New England will have a very slight uptick in yardage and Dante Stallworth will be the go-to guy. Welker will reward fantasy players for punt returns as well as receiving, and don't forget Ben Watson doesn't give away TE catches to Ben Graham any more. NE can take that division but only time will tell.
2007-03-14 16:45:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The stats are "lifelike" with the help of using distinctive function that something can ensue, yet heres why it wont. Tom Brady has in no way had over a ninety two.6 on a season and easily has broken ninety two times. it form of feels stressful to have self assurance he will leap an entire 7 factors whilst his profession universal is a 88.4. Brady has in no way thrown over 30 TDs. Blame it on the recievers he has had yet in actual actuality the NE offense would not place self assurance in passing as much as say a Bengals or Colts offense. Brady isn't required to throw as much as in many circumstances and so wont hit 30 TDs. Yardage seems lifelike until you notice he has purely broken 4,000 as quickly as and his next maximum is 3,seven hundred. returned lifelike yet in addition reason to doubt. next Randy Moss is A WASH UP. He would not attempt stressful. He won't have the ability to run around the middle. He has alligator hands and he has lost a step in his age. He has 11 TDs interior the final 2 years and easily 750 yards a season to boot. he continues to be a sturdy 2-3 yet not somebody who can replace an offense or tension a shielding gameplan. the astounding is the Pats wont bypass 13-3, they wont win the super Bowl, and there will be a gaggle of annoyed Pats followers who nevertheless think of they're greater useful than anybody else. The Pats have been in no way the main gifted group, that they had heart and chemisty, something they look dropping. Dumping branch given which you think of you are able to replace him with something or every physique is dumb. Neglecting Troy Brown, in line with possibility the who represents what this is to be a Pat given which you further Welker, Dante, and Moss in is stupid. He gave each and every little thing even enjoying O and D, provide the guy his due. The Colts, Chargers are greater useful, and the Ravens, Bengals, Broncos, Steelers, can beat you any day of the week. enable the season play out in fact until now you crown them because of the fact of a video interest.
2016-12-18 13:49:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by holness 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say brady has somewhere around 3300 yds, 25 td, and 15 int. he wont have the same numbers as he did when branch was there because branch played all games. stallworth is not physically capable of that. welker is not a real wr. all he can do is kick return or be a viable 3rd/4th wr. and caldwell is a solid 2nd/3rd option. but people are forgetting about jabar gaffney. he had a great playoff run and if he's back(i believe he is) then signing kelly washington was worthless.
2007-03-14 11:36:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stephen B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stallworth will have HUGE year if he dosn't get hurt. And they just signed Kelly Washington. also Reche "No Hands" Caldwell SUCKS!
2007-03-14 11:34:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by MJS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋