Cena and Batista both retained there titles at wm23.
2007-03-14 11:24:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
yes cuz neither should be champion. they only reason batista is ,main eventing is because when Vince and Steph look at talent they see a big guy who is good looking and give him a main event level push/ batista is just on steroids and is a waste of money while Cena....dont even get me started on Cena/ I COULD BEAT CENA IN A REAL WRESTLING MATCH LIKE OLYMPIC STYLE AND IM 13 FOR CHRIST SAKE
2007-03-14 11:30:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't have a preference as to who wins between Cena and HBK. After Backlash, neither should be holding the belt.
As for Batista vs. Undertaker, keeping the Deadman's undefeated streak alive is everything to me. Batista can get DQ-ed to keep the belt, and while that might get me riled for that night and that week's SmackDown, I'll calm down the week after, knowing that Undertaker is still unbeaten at WrestleMania.
If Batista would break the streak, the only guy I'd go out of my way to watch on WWE is Khali, and I would hope, pray, hope some more, and pray some more that Khali would be the next World Heavyweight Champion at Judgment Day even though he's currently on RAW.
2007-03-14 19:13:08 · answer #2 · answered by Judge Ghis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would be mad if Batista retained the championship and really mad if Cena did too
2007-03-14 18:29:22 · answer #3 · answered by RKA: Leader of PAC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it would but I have a funny feeling that is exactly what is going to happen. no chance in hell of taker beating batista imo, do you honestly think kevin dunn would give the title to taker over his toy-boy lover batista, after all this freaked up steriod user has been unbeaten with the title for "2 YEARS" barring the injury break; so he has never lost the title.
Michaels mite scrape through against Cena but I wouldn't hold your breath for that one.
2007-03-14 18:37:28 · answer #4 · answered by Rossie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
welll... i like both Batista and cena but yes it would be because it gets old after a while and HBK and taker are great wrestlers so they deserve the titles.
Undertaker
14-0
2007-03-14 19:27:51 · answer #5 · answered by TEDDY =) 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
batista doesnt desevre to beat taker at wrestlemania. he has no passion for the business. im being serioues watch his match very closly. you see that during most of it he gets his *** kicked. then makes a comback by using a spinebuster then shakes the ropes and batista bomb. BORING
And Cena is okay not great but ok but i think somone new should step up to the plate.
2007-03-14 18:28:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Batista yes! Cena I'm not quite sure if i care if he wins or not!
2007-03-14 18:36:00 · answer #7 · answered by ♥**Me**♥ 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
definetly, but i would be angrier if batista retained because im more of an undertaker fan and it wouldnt matter 2 me if cena nor shawn michaels won they both suck if you ask me. and they both are waste of time.
2007-03-14 18:27:59 · answer #8 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Roidtista ends The Undertaker's streak myself and others will consider it the ultimate job match and personally after 18 years of watching the WWE I won't watch it anymore. I hope that answers your question.
2007-03-14 22:41:12 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell yea that would be one of the worst wrestlemanias if that happend but i have a feeling there gonna make cena over come the odds once again and beat hbk
2007-03-14 18:30:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋