Nope, world hunger keeps too many bleeding harts nicely distracted. I need that ploy so I can take over the World.
2007-03-14 18:48:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by higg1966 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would eat multiple pieces of dog crap if it ended world hunger.
2007-03-14 10:06:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jason The Great 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No - if the rest of the world is so hungry, let them eat the steaming pile of dog crap.
2007-03-14 10:07:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andrew 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh, I'd like to think I would, but I have a very powerful gag reflex, and highly influential stomach. Things I find distasteful seldom get closer than an inch from my lips...
2007-03-14 10:07:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Icewomanblockstheshot 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell yeah, i mean if i could save the lives of the millions that die in other countries just by eating some crap then its most deffinitly well worth it.
2007-03-14 10:06:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by deathstoll92 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
look, you're a cow, and cows have consistently been, and consistently would be eaten, settle for it...build a bridge and recover from it. And once you're fortunate i could even slip you quite mutaltion in an prolonged time.
2016-12-14 19:09:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, because you would not have to eat no more and that's the most problem in the world.
2007-03-14 10:08:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by babygirl27 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha. good question. yes, i would. but think, if the starving all ate dog crap, then that would (kind of) solve world hunger. not disease though. it would increase that.
2007-03-14 10:09:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by emily m 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. It would be disgusting, and I'd probably barf it right back up, but it's a small price to pay to help so many others. But does it have to be steaming?
2007-03-14 10:05:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Speedy 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No I'd give it too my brother to eat it!!Let him end world hunger!
2007-03-14 10:06:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋