The death penalty should only be for the worst of the worst. More times than not I am against the penalty when life without possibility of parole is an option. However to place a nine year old girl in a plastic bag and place her in a shallow grave alive, and leave the state to avoid capture ... he deserves to die as soon as possible. I realy don't want his blood on my hands but he needs to die and soon.
2007-03-14 09:28:46 · 6 answers · asked by Big Will 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No, he should be thrown into prison with the general population and whatever happens to him, happens.
Think Dahmer (we all know what happened to him in prison)
2007-03-14 09:31:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he should be put to death. I have heard that the most painful death is lethal injection but that looks to painless and restful to me. I think he should have the same fear that poor little girl had. He needs to pay the concequences for his actions. I know the Bible says to forgive, but doesnt it also say eye for an eye?
2007-03-14 09:46:05 · answer #2 · answered by tcg7213 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I agree with you. And I don't believe that he should be declared "mentally retarded" because of his IQ score, in order to avoid the Death Penalty.
He obviously knew how to torture, rape, and murder a child. I don't think a person who was mentally retarded would know how to do this.
2007-03-14 09:40:28 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say the same, but his sick a** into a bag and place him into a shallow grave and leave him there. Sick bastard.
2007-03-14 09:37:34 · answer #4 · answered by buzyb 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not just yes but HELL YES! I would be willing to execute him with my bare hands.
2007-03-14 09:32:49 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Put him in a bag, and bury him. No less, no more.
2007-03-14 09:33:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋