English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For me, I'd need to see the actual plane hit the Pentagon. If I could see that, the rest of the overwhelming evidence would be less overwhelming. What about you?

2007-03-14 07:38:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

5 answers

1. Downing Street Memo

2. The private international and domestic airlines stock reports traded and sold up to two months prior to 9/11

3. All video footage from the section of the Pentagon that was destroyed by a so called plane.

4. I would have to know who was Department Head in charge of security at the World Trade Center that day - I would have to know for a fact that there were no relatives of George Bush controlling security before or after 9/11 at the World Trade Center.
(But records in fact show that a relative of George Bush was handling all security at the Trade Centers right before 9/11)

5. Flight plans for the Bin Ladens

6. Scientific breakdown of all elements in the dust at the World Trade Center site - Ground Zero.

7. All information from the Air Traffic Control in Boston including any information regarding the flight box for intellegent auto pilot system and its configuration for that day

8. Transcripts from NORAD and what excersises they were involved in during the attacks

Perhaps there is something in any of the above items that might take the blame off Bush and his whole Administration

(BUT I DOUBT IT !!)

2007-03-14 08:17:06 · answer #1 · answered by scottanthonydavis 4 · 1 0

For the conspirators out there, nothing will satisfy them. They tell you to look at this proof of some random little non issue and claim its absolute proof that their theory is right and because I wont believe their tiny spec of socalled proof I am being manipulated and brainwashed while at the same time they disregard the 99.9 percent of proof in opposition to their own theories. How can anyone like that be take seriously? How can someone be taken seriously that accuses you of denying evidence that discounts the bulk of the evidence in a case like that of 911. Scientiest, politicians, even terrorists themselves agree upon what really happened when terrorists flew their planes into our buildings, yet there are the conspirators grasping onto internet rumors and telling the public that they are the ones being manipulated. The illogical mindset and hyppocritical thinking makes it pretty much impossible to convince a conspirator of anything other then what they already believe.

2007-03-14 14:51:00 · answer #2 · answered by cadisneygirl 7 · 4 1

Why don't you go to youtube and search Abu Izzadeen? He is a radical Muslim who speaks pretty clear English. There is your proof of 9/11.

Start with this video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpWxb-eD1O0

2007-03-14 14:45:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

A bunch of fabricated intelligence similar to what he used to convince congress to vote for his oil war.

2007-03-14 14:48:33 · answer #4 · answered by Lou 6 · 1 2

watch da movie loose change

mr bush seems 2b behind dis.....i pitty da us citizens

2007-03-14 14:46:56 · answer #5 · answered by Rohan Kapadia 2 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers