What should be done if the President tries to attack Iran?

Question

Since he knowingly lied to us on a 100 issues about Iraq before he attacked it, I believe he should certainly be retrained by congress from attacking Iran.

Maybe there are some good reasons to attack Iran, but the only reasons I've heard were from Bush, and I simply can't trust a single word from that wolves mouth.

Impeachment would be a beautiful solution.

In Sane's comment, I couldn't tell whether he was making a lame joke, or if he's simply a retard.

Reply to ToJade.
My plan? I never would have gone to war with Iraq in the first place.
I would have sent assassins from the C.I.A or something to kill Saddam. No trial. No jury. Just justice.

I would have actually "tried" to find Osama Bin Laden "unlike George Bush who didn't give a damn".

And I would have sent American troops into Israel to "completely support the Israelis", and kill every terrorist that tries to attack them.
And that would win about half the war terrorism.
Then I would just nuke something in Arabia.

Answer 1

The dems wouldn't let him. If he does succeed, then sign up for the military.

Answer 2

There is no good reason to attack Iran. The US is the only country talking about and probably developing new nuclear weapons. That is at the very least a provocation to China and Russia that will spur them on to develop new nuclear weapons as well. Maybe another nuclear power in the Middle east is a good thing. Why should there be only one nuclear power in the region? Where is the balance? With India and Pakistan having nuclear capabilities it is highly unlikely that either one would think they could resort to nuclear attacks with impunity against the other.
If Bush attacks Iran the congress should take that wasted money out of the billions being spent in the region on Iraq, Egypt and Israel. All that money is obviously making the region more dangerous not safer. We are the ones flooding the region with cruise missiles and other massively destructive armaments. No country in the region is capable of attacking the US so why do we appropriate money in the military budget for the area? Without our money maybe the aggression in the area will be lessened as the countries tend to the business of developing their economies without developing war based economies. After all if it comes to nuclear war in the region we have the capability to be the ultimate arbiter.
When it's all said and done it's about oil is it not? We are certainly not decrying the lack of democracy in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait but Iran and Venezuela are a different story.

Answer 3

Call in the Spartans! Show movies about ancient Persian empires! Remember Thermopylae! (This is what Ahmadinejad thinks we will do when we attack Iran.)

Answer 4

We should support him in every way we can, and also suport the troops irregardless. We should not start with lying about him allegedly lying, and undermining the war effort, and basically being ignorant, selfish and unpatriotic. Execution of anti-war Liberals as communist traitors would be a better solution.

Answer 5

I would suggest either just executing the POS or putting him into a mental institution for the rest of his life!

Answer 6

If he attempts to attack Iran.
It would mean only one thing, (he grew a pair)

Answer 7

There is no good reason to attack Iran, Bush just wants their oil.............

Answer 8

best thing is to go hide under your bed.

Answer 9

First tell us your plan .

Answer 10

Impeach him.