in reading the housing law advice given to the LA i noticed that they are told that in order to claim a claiment guilty of forming a contrived tenancy they must first find that the tenancy is of a commercial nature. i wonder if this is accurate? i assume there must be proven intent to fraud the HB scheme by forming the contrived tenancy and if the tenancy is contrived it must be for commercial reasons. if the tenancy contrived for personal reasons do both parties need to gain from this? assuming that the tenancy was created to abuse the scheme then money would be the reasons for this....help its so confusing.
2007-03-14
06:25:21
·
1 answers
·
asked by
maggie
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics