English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-14 06:10:12 · 12 answers · asked by ALASPADA 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

And to the ditto head Frankenettes to say he researches things is a joke, unless the reseach counts if it is from the left wing conspiracy theory group. I might not agree with a Hilary Clinton or a Harry Reid but at least I can see there facts and reasoning.
The best is the ones who will denounce my post for a character hit on al frankenstein when they is where he makes his money attacting people on personal issues or their weight boy that went out in grade school al.

2007-03-14 06:57:25 · update #1

12 answers

For the same reason some people are so enamored with someone so misinformed on government like Ann Coulter. Because these are names and these names sell books. Even though these books are strictly full of the authors' opinions which are very rarely supported by facts, it is amazing the number of people who regurgitate this information with nothing more than "Because Al Franken said this" or "Ann Coulter said that". What's really funny is that their fans don't demand proof from them concerning their ridiculous statements yet in the Y Answers community if someone asks a question like "Does George W. Bush wet the bed?" or "Was Barack Obama on the Cream of Wheat box?" , somebody is going to ask for proof or a link.
The answer is, if your name is well known and you author books you can get away with saying stupid things that don't have one iota of evidence.

2007-03-14 06:26:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Get real. Why don't you see if you can Rush, or Hannity, or O'reilly will run for office? They'd get laughed out of a race!!


I'll take the experts that he had on his show's word and Franken's political stances over a (R) puke's any day of the week. November 7th was no aberration---the (R) legislators are too stupid to comprehend that remaining on the S.S. Bush is like being a deckhand on the S.S. Titanic and the iceberg is a coming in 08' --BABY!!

Bashing at the "Clueless Newbie" level is forgiven once--next time "factualize" an entry and avoid the personal bias.

2007-03-14 06:24:39 · answer #2 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0 0

Franken is not misinformed; he spends more time getting his information than ninety percent of the citizens. His sources are accurate. Your problem is with the conclusion he arrives at, and the context he applies.

So first let us agree that he is, in fact, well informed. It is permissible to disagree without defaming each other. Let's try that for a bit.

Now, why would people like Al Franken? I bet it's because he can make you think and laugh at the same time. I confess to being left of center by your standards, but I bet Al Franken would say I was too conservative. I laugh at humour that takes something to its logical extreme and demonstrates the flaws in the idea.

I laugh just as hard at effective conservative humour. It can cut both ways, and it's a great help for those of us who watch politics that some of the people who talk about it are entertaining as well as informing. Most of the ideologues are so damned full of themselves and serious that my cerebral cortex gets constipated.

So let us praise and be grateful to those who can make us laugh, Al Franken included! Whether we agree with their ideas or not, they have brightened our days, and we do love them for it.

2007-03-14 06:37:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For the same reason some people are enamored by Fox News. They care more about their party than common sense and fact. You see it on both the right AND the left.

2007-03-14 06:19:33 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 1 0

Probably for the same reason someone is so enamored with someone so misinformed on government like Rush Libmbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Ann Coulter.

2007-03-14 06:14:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

enable's do a countdown: 4th place: Al Franken. he's vile, he's rotten to the middle, yet up until he have been given into politics, he became into esentially in basic words a pest. shall we desire to attend until he spews his idiocy around the Senate in the previous we elect his authentic unfavourable top nicely worth. third place: Barney Frank. he's between the idiots in can charge for the Fannie-Freddie fiasco. yet many cases his stupidity keeps him from reaching as plenty injury as might desire to ideally be available. 2nd place: Nancy Pelosi. This former hippie chick stinks no longer in basic words of patchouli yet of countless grimy procedures and reprehensible habit. She actual THREATENED fellow democrats with out help for re-election in the event that they did no longer % up and actually sign the bill. This byatch on wheels had the nerve to chop back the copies of the bill to a minimum of one, ensuring no you will possibly be able to desire to nonetheless desire to even understand what they have been vote casting for. 1st place: Al Gore. you probably did no longer comprise him on your checklist, yet via way of his mind-blowing ability for universal misery and destruction, he's the suitable canines (make that the suitable skanky mongrel). Gore is huge wakeful of his disingenous concept of man made international warming is a lie, yet he does no longer care how plenty he destroys national economies or what number people he will condemn to generations of poverty, just to get über rich and to push HIS globalist time table. top, it rather is my take on the main important evil. want i did no longer forget approximately each and every person. yet I actual have the nagging feeling i've got have been given skipped over somebody whose call starts off with "O".

2016-10-18 09:08:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Name some issues franken is "misinformed" on?

I find it hilarious that al wiped the floor with that yellowbellied con chickenhawk dildo o'reilly!

2007-03-14 06:14:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I am about as liberal as they come and I wouldn't vote for Al franken , he is a Zionist.

2007-03-14 06:14:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Severe crebral retardation.

2007-03-14 06:13:50 · answer #9 · answered by Sane 6 · 1 1

If you think Franken is misinformed, please give examples. It is impossible to answer your question without further information.

2007-03-14 06:14:11 · answer #10 · answered by KCBA 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers