personally,i would pay for my daughter even if i never saw her....cause i want her to have the best, and that would help....but mothers use visitation in evil games all the time, so should the fathers be able to do the same thing? its onlyfair, really. not seeing your children can be a living hell. so can not having money. if we made the system more fair, would the children win? if the father can see the kids, but chooses not to, he pays by default, and should be made to be known for what he is...........and is court orderedchild support fair? in most cases it seems so, but let me hear your opinions....on the subject.....not on me...thanks
2007-03-14
05:59:56
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Polls & Surveys
child support is for the CHILD. but so is visitation. they both hurt the child. thats the question. and i happen to be a stay at home dad which is why i have time to do this.
2007-03-14
06:08:45 ·
update #1
no, i mean...no visitation, no support. not lots of visitation, no support.
2007-03-14
06:22:26 ·
update #2