I agree this war should not be funded
2007-03-14 04:08:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
The problem with this is that you are acting impulsive and not considering the major complications that would happen as a result of not funding the war. I agree that we should pull out immediately, but I disagree that we should handicap the troops by not sending them supplys, food and money to keep them alive. It's completely asanine to think that somehow we would get out of this war with less casualties if we stop funding it... the final result is that we would leave many of our fellow Americans stuck in Iraq with no money and not a care for what they have done.
2007-03-14 11:25:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by GM87 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds very easy but it ain't. I'm very much against this contrived war, believe me, but there are things underway that is not made public... and many other things like the mass murders that would occur if the American presence would suddenly disappear... and what about the commitment to peace that was promised by America (not just by the Republicans according to world observers). But, we, Americans, have given people hope to fight tyranny and fight for democracy and just pulling up stakes and leaving the mess WE started ain't doing anyone any justice. Also, world opinion would certainly be against us, and no nation would put much faith or belief in us... can you imagine the mass killings that would occur if American troops just picked up and left? WE caused them to fight for something that we have yet to deliver because of the bungling politicians trying to do what the highly TRAINED and EXPERIENCED military personnel knows how to do...
Believe me, I hate the idea that companies such as Halliburten and the others owned by Dubya's and Prick Cheney's cronies are profiteering like ghouls... and I wish ALL elected officials would grow a pair of testicles and put a stop to the wastefulness, the mismanaging and sqaundering by allowing profiteering and MAKE those companies return the funds they've swindled the government out of (by over-charging and over-billing) but simply cutting funds and stranding people and leaving others in harms way (that WE caused) is not the answer. Please do not forget that I am NOT for this war... but, we're in it and we can't just get our troops out without taking precautions to prevent mass murders... that's simply not the right thing to do.
2007-03-14 11:23:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh honey, my husband is a democrat and his balls are quite noticible. I would like to know why republicans don't have a heart, or brains for that matter. No courage either, they have certainly set up a lot of fall guys recently. Gee, they need to see the wizard.
2007-03-14 11:33:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wait til a Democrat makes it in office , then you guys are all going to have to grow new wavo's!!! You F----in' NAZI !!!!!! Just cuz the full who's got all of your tax-paying dollars invested and moved it to another country so he wont have to pay taxes on it, is in the White House, all of a sudden you Nazi's think yo' all that!! Well you have an 'Eye-Opener' coming your way, I promise you this, you blinded Fulls!! I'm a woman and I grew balls with this STUPID Question!!! You guys are the one's who are Blind, and dont know a Thief when you see one!!! He's stealing from your children's future's!!! What FOOLS vote for a guy who dont even know how to talk, without going in circles, and having it "Pre-written" for him!! How stupid are you that your proud of the Trillion's of dollars in dept he got us in!! Oh, my gosh, I cant even lower myself to your level anymore, you idiot's!!!! Buy a pair of glasses, and get your noses checked, so you can smell all the Trillion's he's stealing from all of you, who still have blind faith in him!!! GEEZ,, I've heard it all now!!!!
2007-03-14 11:15:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hmg♥Brd 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I agree, and while they are at it, impeach both Cheney and Bush.
This was the only way to end the unnecessary and immoral Vietnam war.
What was good back then, is good now.
.
2007-03-14 11:12:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
what about the troops that are already there? it takes money to send them back you know. we need to keep funding to make sure that present troops still in there are eating right.
2007-03-14 11:10:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
They do have balls, but the Democrats all suffer from a debilitating case of non-descending testicles.
2007-03-14 11:09:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by blairs_smirking_revenge 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Int he dress Hillary was wearing the other day, I thought I could see "her" balls....
2007-03-14 11:21:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because most are not ball players. Think about it and you can answer your own question.
2007-03-14 11:10:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by moonrose777 4
·
2⤊
2⤋