Many of you claim it wasn't political but he even fired the lead US attorney in charge of Whitewater for someone he knew, that sounds political to me.
2007-03-14 03:31:06 · 12 answers · asked by Scott B 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Again Captain C thanks for showing your ignorance to all of us. It just couldn't be political could it, I'm just calling you on your junk beliefs, stop whining!
2007-03-14 03:38:53 · update #1
It's official, Chi guy is a bonafied idiot blind liberal. Clearly you don't believe that junk.
2007-03-15 06:58:44 · update #2
You didn't hear that on CNN did you. And you never will
2007-03-14 03:35:10 · answer #1 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
First it wasn't 2 it replaced into 8 that have been fired. 2d there replaced into plenty controversy over the way it replaced into carried out and the secret conferences greater advantageous as much as the form. a minimum of Clinton fired all of them and not single certainly one of them out. i'm no longer a Clinton supporter, yet a minimum of it wasn't a secret. It replaced into the media did no longer locate it information truly properly worth reporting.
2016-12-14 18:51:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! The same question 17 times. Come on Scott. Move on.org will ya.
Here is my previous response: (gotta love copy paste)
Great info. This proves that Clinton's firing wasn't targeted at those who did not push his personal agenda like the Bush admin did.
Which is worse, an impersonal decision to clean house, OR a vindictive, malicious, systematic firing designed to intimidate those who do not make decisions which are unfair and politically driven?
Everything Bush and his cronies do goes 100% against every branch of governmental checks and balances. Bush's USSR. The Bush admin historically intimidated the CIA (Cheney), intimidated the Pentagon (Rumsfeld), and is obviously attempting to intimidate the US Justices (Gonzalez). Bush simply believes that the constitution is his to do with as he wills. Why people defend him is nothing short of bizarre.
2007-03-14 03:41:36 · answer #3 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was a saint compared to the things dubya's doing. What good has Bush done for you & the country? (Or maybe you're getting paid for these postings). Keep closing your eyes, dude, that's how countries wind up with dictatrships!
2007-03-14 03:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
More neocon lies? Clinton did not 'purge' anything; he fired 93 attorneys, including one who was harassing him in Arkansas.
This is nothing like what Bush has done in his illegal firing of attorneys.
What don't you get? Bush is wrong!
2007-03-14 03:35:53 · answer #5 · answered by Indy Plume 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Did you know you've asked this question, like six times now?
2007-03-14 03:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Spirish_1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Looks like Republicans missed the boat if they didn't stop him.
Now whose fault is that?
2007-03-14 03:34:48 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Did you know that you've been asking the same questions all morning? Rephrase it however you want, you can't make it into what you're trying to make it into.
2007-03-14 03:34:42 · answer #8 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
FYI captain, they wanted the purge 2 yrs ago.
2007-03-14 03:34:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Facts don't matter to liberals. They just don't care. It's blind hatred for Bush. Pure politics.
2007-03-14 03:34:42 · answer #10 · answered by John 5 · 0⤊ 6⤋
so what..move on, this has already been proven that it doesn't compare to what is going on now. get out of the past.
2007-03-14 03:35:31 · answer #11 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋