If she really wanted to be a humanitarian, why doesn't she just financially bless these families that can't afford these kids instead of breaking these families up with her money. The Vietnamese child I understand has been an orphan since birth. Fine, I can understand that. But the other two mutts had families that loved them. This just makes me absolutely disgusted. Would you want somebody to come in with their money and 'buy' your child because they can give it a better life?
2007-03-14 03:27:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Dear "A", That just sickens me more. How about donatinig 10% of her movies to this country. We're the ones putting most of her money in her wallet. Where's the 10% for our kids?
2007-03-14 03:34:41 · update #1
Dear C-a-s-s, As I've mentioned, why didn't she financially bless Zahara's family instead of buying her? She could have let that family remain together.
2007-03-14 03:44:13 · update #2
I heard she donates 10% of what she makes for each film to a country, I think her "child-buying" has gotten a little out of control. It was ok at first but now its just getting ridiculous. I would rather let someone adopt my child then let them starve to death or die from some disease.
Update: I personally don't watch her movies in the theatre or buy any on DVD. I think other countries who are less fortunate should be getting help, it's her choice to help because its her money she earned regardless of how she made her income. You have to remember there are other celebrities who do help the children in this country and thats their choice.
2007-03-14 03:32:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I cannot stand Angelina Jolie, so please don't take this as I am trying to defend her. She did not break up any families, Both her first 2 children were put up for adoption by families because they were unable to take care of them, or the families were deceased. Children are put up for adoption because someone is trying to find them a good home. They do have all the money so these kids will never go without anything material, but I cannot imagine how they could have anytime with parents considering they are both working actors and are trying to fill a small stadium with children. I think Angelina is completely unstable and probably not the best bet for examples, but to say that Zahara should be should have been left in Africa with her family that was rapidly dying because of Aids and poverty rather than given a home with someone who can care (or pay someone to care) about them is a little ridiculous.
2007-03-14 10:40:09 · answer #2 · answered by ○•○•Cassie•○•○ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you. I think she is doing this for the attention. She donates money to all those countries but never does anything here in her own country. I don't her anymore because she seems to be addicted to adopting children. There are other ways to help out besides adopting.
2007-03-14 12:48:25 · answer #3 · answered by Sunshine Suzy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am sick of angelina jolie in general she is a homewrecking incest slut. i mean seriously by claiming to be humanitarian thats like a slap in the face to the people who are actuallying doing something, i mean hell how many people are adopting in the country right now, just because she's rich off of male hormones doesn't mean that her adopting is something special. the kids may be better off but they sure as hell are going to have issues in developing morals. with that slimey pair for parents.
2007-03-14 11:13:39 · answer #4 · answered by tamara 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, your not alone, no disrespect to anyone...but I don't like the woman anyways. She doesn't really care about family, only the attention. If she cared about family, then she wouldn't have broken up a perfectly good one (Jen & Brad)...people may say that it was both Brad and Jolie, but if she cared about family she would have told Brad to go fly a kite if he was the first one to make the "move". But I think she only likes the attention...I think she is ugly to be honest of my opinion also. No disrespect to anyone who likes her.
2007-03-14 10:37:47 · answer #5 · answered by cdb774 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO!!! I would have to agree, we are the american public who pays to go to her stupid movies, I will not watch a movie if she or Brad Pitt are in it... He is a cheater and she is a tramp and they think that it's okay to have all these children, what kind of morals are they going to teach them, how to cheat on your spouse and make out with your brother? Have you ever wondered why they go to other countries to adopt? Becausde they have no moral and can not adopt a child here. They both make me sick. we have starving children here... sorry just venting..
2007-03-14 10:39:27 · answer #6 · answered by Tuesday S 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am really tired of her and her Child buying escapades it's really really dumb. So what we all know shes got Money!!
2007-03-14 12:00:08 · answer #7 · answered by celia g 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No you are not alone...I am sure that she not only buys these kids, I bet that she has nanny's take care of all of them...I think its a status thing...
It's terrible and you cannot and will not ever be able to buy the love of a person..
2007-03-14 10:31:20 · answer #8 · answered by alisharenee33 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No, your not the only one. She is really weird.
2007-03-14 10:36:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yup....but there is is no reason to call children mutts!!!!
2007-03-14 10:36:08 · answer #10 · answered by Peachy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋