English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Thats not hard.... But its its a big deal, why don't you invent a new keyboard?

2007-03-14 02:55:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, Just maybe the person is missing a hand or possibly an arm. He could have lost some fingers, in an accident. Don't judge people, until you know what the circumstances are!!
I hope this is not the case, butttttttt heyyyyyy, ya nevaaa no!!!!

2007-03-14 10:25:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How much easier can it get? Try typing a ñ on a keyboard that doesn't have it.

2007-03-14 09:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by guicho79 4 · 0 0

And on a UK keyboard it's shift and ' so even easier! You don't have to move anything but your little fingers... ;)

CG.

2007-03-14 09:56:27 · answer #4 · answered by cymraesgwyllt 4 · 0 0

Did you just join Answers to ask this question? If so, you got answers, and your profile name probably says it all: lazy typer. How is shift+2 hard to type?

2007-03-14 10:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I hear ya. They should put it in a more convenient place since it's used all the time. Maybe I'm just being lazy though. I do like my auto-complete. lol

2007-03-14 09:56:57 · answer #6 · answered by sweet.pjs1 5 · 0 0

They could have made it a lot harder than shift and 2.

2007-03-14 10:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by jb 2 · 0 0

i know any other way except for two but they are pretty hard

1. character map in system tools
2. the alt and numbers thing!

2007-03-14 09:57:36 · answer #8 · answered by Spyro The Dragon 5 · 0 0

Shift and 2 how hard is that...

2007-03-14 09:54:55 · answer #9 · answered by MotoXPrincess99 2 · 0 0

i agree its not that hard shifttt and numbaa 2.
not hard at all.
dont be lazy

2007-03-14 09:55:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers