The are hoarders, whether is is money or yahoo answers points. The like to hold until things as it provides them with some arbitrary status. Thus they will not spring the 5 points to ask a question for themselves yet do on long winded rants about things that don't even remotely pertain to the question just to get some arbitrary point across. A point that was most like borrowed from Bill O'rielly, Ann coulter or some other extreme right commentator.
2007-03-14 02:48:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by smedrik 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
It shows that there are dumb human beings on both area of the aisle. I said an "on the line" phase the position human beings suggested they hated Bush. They were then requested why and 1/2 of them were stumped. a quarter of them appeared like a botched headline and a quarter had valid arguments. I also said yet another phase the position self proclaimed liberals were requested who the vice president, Sec of State, Speaker, and different severe score human beings were and that they had no idea or had unique guesses. they did not know the bill of Rights or distinct uncomplicated & major information about our united states's historic previous. Why may an adament democrat favor to understand the sixteenth President besides? you're basically attempting to get human beings going.
2016-12-01 23:53:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by dismukes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's because you ask questions with false premises and so our responses refute the false premises.
Like "would you rather have a tax cut or reduce the deficit" - we point out that since the tax cuts revenues have risen much faster than expected and thereby reduced the deficit. It doesn't answer your question as asked, it refutes the premise behind your question.
Your entire class warfare mentality is also false - it just doesn't square with reality.
And you want to talk of daddies getting their kids through school, how about Teddy the cheater????
2007-03-14 02:51:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No reading comprehension issues here. You should expect people to stray slightly off topic when 99% of liberal questions are nothing more than biased and factually incorrect statements with a question mark at the end.
2007-03-14 03:08:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by VoodooPunk 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Thank you so much for your concern. I have no comprehension problem what so ever. Although I do think that you maybe a little confused - both sides here are equally successful at ranting. Pot calling the kettle black.
2007-03-14 02:51:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Did all of their daddies buy their way through school like Bush's daddy did for him?"
I suppose we should emulate your self made, hard working, common men like John Kerry...Al Gore...Ted Kennedy, right hypocrite?
2007-03-14 02:50:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Trollbuster 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Cons don't like the facts.
2007-03-14 03:32:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, they do. If you post a link to a news site other than FOX, they are unable to read it.
2007-03-14 02:46:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
No they don't.
2007-03-14 02:44:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
1⤊
1⤋