2007-03-14 00:50:26 · 3 answers · asked by karen c 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
72k is alot not to mention the fact that she gave up her parental rights to get that MONEY sole custody goes to paul.
2007-03-14 01:09:27 · update #1
Sure looks that way, what did she do to deserve $54 million?
2007-03-14 00:53:07 · answer #1 · answered by ropemancometh 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Getting the money is not proof that this is all she was "in it" just for the money. It is not like if you truly loved someone, but it didn't work out, that you would just not take the money. Of course you would! Who wouldn't? Why wouldn't you? Whether she really loved him (and anyone who saw them together before last year knows she did) is irrelevant.
2. Just being a McCartney fan and not liking Mills is not proof that she was "in it" just for the money. I don't like the gal. I'm a big fan of Paul McCartney. Obviously that could affect my opinion on the situation, but I, for one, am above that.
3. Even Paul McCartney is not saying she was just "in it" for the money.
There is absolutely no evidence that this is true. It is not like he saved her out of the poorhouse. She was a fairly successful model before she met him. Yeah, it's a lot of money. Yeah, she probably doesn't deserve all of it. But McCartney knew exactly what he was getting into, so I don't feel sorry for him in the least. That is what prenuptials are for.
Odds are that you are all just jealous. :-)
2007-03-14 08:04:48 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Considering that she wants $20k a day for the baby, I'd say, YUP!
I could raise a kid for 18 years on $20k..
2007-03-14 07:53:56 · answer #3 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋