English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My assignment is to write a comparative book review, which I've done. But she asked us to include the publication year of the books. How should I include it so that it doesn't seem awkward. Just saying: It was published in 1997, seems... so awkward.

Could I say [name of book] (year of publication) e.g. Garth Nix's "Shade's Children" (1997) is set...

Any help would be appreciated.

2007-03-13 22:02:36 · 4 answers · asked by MissUnderstood 3 in Education & Reference Homework Help

4 answers

Writing Comparative Book Reviews

When you receive your assignment to write a comparative book review, take careful note of what aspects of each book your instructor wishes you to compare. If the books are on the same topic, you may be asked to compare the THEMES(Particular part of a general topic that you have chosen or been assigned for research. A theme sets limits on the area to be investigated and the points that will be made)
THESIS(Same as a theme some instructors ask students to begin their papers with a thesis statement– a clear statement of the principal point you intend to make in your paper. This online guide refers to the same goal by asking the student to begin their papers with a clear statement of their theme.)
of the two books. In this case:

Analyze the similarities and differences of the two authors’ themes rather than writing long descriptions of each one of them.
Remember, you are writing a book review, not a book report!
In addition to comparing themes, your instructor may ask you to compare and contrast the evidence used to support the themes:

A typical assignment will ask you to compare the different ways each author presents his or her evidence. One author may use primary sources, and the other secondary sources; one author may emphasize numerical data, and the other quotations from primary sources.
Your instructor may ask you to compare the conclusions drawn from the evidence by each author or the different assumptions the authors make about the evidence.
The key to success when writing a comparative book review is to locate several points of similarity or dissimilarity (or a few of each) and to focus your review on them.
Build your review around the connections between the books. That is the purpose of this kind of assignment.

2007-03-13 22:39:04 · answer #1 · answered by Rozzy 3 · 0 0

That is how I would do it. I was the Book's Editor for a local paper. I would start out the first paragraph with the title of the book, the author, and the publication month and year when I started the review. It's the best way to go about it and it's easier for the reader of the review to get the information if they decide they want to read the book. Incidentally, EXCELLENT choice in authors. I love Garth Nix!!! He is an excellent writer and keeps the reader completely engrossed!! Good luck!!

2007-03-13 22:23:11 · answer #2 · answered by roritr2005 6 · 0 0

How with regard to the recent twilight action picture? you may overview the e book vs the action picture (assuming you have time to study it and watch it). you may desire to study the wii in nice condition for the nintendo wii. reason i point out it rather is because of the fact it rather is the extensive form a million toughest ingredient to purchase perfect now. It sells out interior of minutes of being positioned on cabinets. Is it quite all that it rather is cracked as much as be? is this in basic terms a christams frenzy like the tickle me elmo? Can it quite enable you to get in nice condition or is it a gimmick?

2016-10-02 02:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by holtzer 4 · 0 0

You need to look up MLA (Modern Language Association) formatting, which is considered the authority for scholastic papers. I believe putting the year in parentheses when you aren't actually creating a bibliography and/or footnotes is correct.

2007-03-13 22:14:08 · answer #4 · answered by rkallaca 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers