English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i think no.

2007-03-13 21:35:01 · 6 answers · asked by jon 1 in Sports Wrestling

6 answers

neither michaels nor cena should be the champ. michaels is at the point where he should only be used to put over up and coming wrestlers. cena is just not a good wrestler.

on another point, i think cena, batista, and lashley should all lose their championships. none of them really put on good matches. except for whenever they are wrestling a low to mid card wrestler, they get their butts handed to them, then in the last few minutes of the match they pull out the win. ex: lashley's match against orton last night.

2007-03-14 02:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by tjr 2 · 0 0

HBK deserves the title a lot more then Cena. Its time for a change.

2007-03-13 21:56:28 · answer #2 · answered by Matt 4 · 1 0

hbk does not deserve anything except FOR THE WWE TITLE!!!! he's the best!!!

Shawn Michaels - Next Champ

2007-03-13 22:37:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he deserves a title than cena.atleat he's in WWE for many years and mas many superb moves has won great matches. cena is not fit to be the WWE champ.

2007-03-13 22:39:49 · answer #4 · answered by avanthi 2 · 0 0

HBK does. Anything to get it off that piece of crap known as John Cena.

2007-03-14 02:33:25 · answer #5 · answered by Arnold 4 · 0 0

tricky question.......HBK been in the game for years and years........but cena needs to loose the title to sumone......im undecided on that matter.

2007-03-14 04:28:18 · answer #6 · answered by thaonewingedangel 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers