Detailed hypothesis on whether lighter or heavier trucks travel faster?

Question

Please give me a detailed hypothesis (around 7-8 sentences) on whether lighter or heavier trucks travel faster.

Answer 1

I would assume that on level ground or going uphill, the lighter truck would definitely win. If it has the same amount of force behind it, it has less to push and so the same amount of energy goes farther. And to be honest, going downhill, I would say the lighter again might win. It would depend, though, on if you were just letting gravity take over or if you were using gasoline. With gasoline, the same would apply as with going uphill or on level ground with the same amount of energy going farther. If it were just gravity, I would say they would arrive at the same time. Supposedly a light and a heavy ball dropped from the same height would land at the same time if air resistance were taken out of the equation. Though air resistance would be a small factor in driving, I would assume it wouldn't have too much of an impact for short distances or times since both trucks are generally made out of metals or plastics and not anything that catches air too much.

Answer 2

the fee of sunshine is a relentless. it is going to consistently holiday at 299 mil metres in line with 2d as i'm specific you be attentive to. in spite of if, Einsteins E=MCsq (C being mild) is merely properly-referred to as photons have not any mass. So in effect it isn't the fee of sunshine however the fee of massless debris. subsequently, thinking the universe consists of approx 4% remember, it has mass. utilising the formula could state that something with even a morsel of mass has to mathematically holiday slower then C. SPL is a relentless of nature regardless of the action or the observer. An occasion, for seen mild (photons) the refractive index of any glass is often around a million.5, meaning mild interior glass travels at precisely c / a million.5 ? 200,000 km/s; so refractive index of air for seen mild is a pair of million.0003, so the fee of sunshine in air is approximately ninety km/s slower than c. One has to additionally evaluate etheres and including velocity. the common rule is, no longer something with mass can holiday on the fee of sunshine. Neddy ---- your rationalization of somebody in geneva doing something with debris reflects you're doing what a great style of folk do. that's attempting to respond to a query with out information on the difficulty. the LHC do 'do something with debris' we do plenty greater then that. Nor do our debris we ruin at the same time get everywhere close to C. in case you don't be attentive to, do exactly no longer pretend to. there is not any longer something incorrect with no longer understanding. I have been given information interior the difficulty by way of fact i asked questions no longer by way of fact i pretended to be attentive to the respond. actually, in seek of solutions is the way forward no longer attempting to sound such as you be attentive to.