This, dear Jerri
is an individual "thang"---there are those in this age group that easily Could be the new 13 !!! Most however, that I know, have a very solid grip on who and "what" they are and are simply into redefining 30 as a balanced and actively applied life as opposed to the "quest" for thrills that is unsually the primary focus of the 20 something's view !!!
2007-03-13 19:30:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No because 30 is old and 20 is young! and if u were 30 and said you were 20 ,in ten years you woul say u were 30 but actually would be 40, and when you die at 90 you will say ur 80 and that you actually will die in 10 more years, and that wouldnt make any since! hope i helped lol!
2007-03-14 02:21:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by softball C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
since 80 is the new 60, then 60 must be the new 40. 40 must be the new 20 and guess what??? if it's like that then under 20 haven't been born yet? my age ain't even their either. so i guess im in limbo. as always. i was in limbo when i was 20. let me stop!!!!
2007-03-14 07:01:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
only if 10 was replaced by 20 and divided by 5
2007-03-14 02:17:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by michael_54550 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I think 85 is the new 20. Old women rock!
2007-03-14 02:20:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by LanternPrime 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
21=31 31=21 2131=3121 noooo! make it go away!
2007-03-14 02:19:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by JOhNe=mc² 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
if that's the case, then my girl friend is a 3rd grader. do u think i will get arrested tomorrow when i drop her off at school?
2007-03-14 06:20:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2007-03-14 02:16:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by lookin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋