2007-03-13 18:39:52 · 21 answers · asked by Matt 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey dog! Lighten up. I'm not very smart, but I don't think I'm a moron. Just interested in your opinion!
2007-03-13 19:13:54 · update #1
One could be president, the other vice, of any planet
in the Milky Way, except this one.
2007-03-13 18:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
short answer: they do no longer. Coulter and her ilk on the two aspects of the aisle are stable for a pair of marvel-fee laughs, yet then their banter gets previous quickly. even nevertheless she talks approximately politics, Ann Coulter is only an entertainer, and not an fairly stable one. clever people from the two ideological camps understand this. authentic politics desires plenty extra talk than sound bites or one-liners. yet those do no longer sell books. it extremely is why Coulter remains around -- she's like the Blue Collar Comedy of politics.
2016-10-18 08:21:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rush is too obsessed with drugs and discreet trips to the Dominican Republic for kiddy sex. Mann Coulter is too obsessed with gays. I doubt either has a fraction of the brains to even figure out how to run for Prez.
2007-03-13 19:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by Gemini 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I laughed when I saw this question!!Are you being serious? If you are, you are an uneducated, ignorant moron. If you're not, here's my answer...I would figure out a way to leave the country and withdraw my citizenship. Both of those people lie regularly about all kinds of things (they spout off statistics about global warming, etc. that they've made up). As a matter of fact, I honestly don't know if either of them believe much of what they say...they make their living as conservative commentators, and they gain attention from saying things that are outrageous. I don't know which is more foolish..the stuff they say, or the people who are dumb enough to agree with what they say!!!
2007-03-13 18:49:39 · answer #4 · answered by idog 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Given the choice, I'd vote for Barney as a write in candidate!
Hey, BTW, what's the difference between the Hindenburg and Rush Limbaugh?
One was a flaming Nazi gas bag and the other was a dirigible!
2007-03-13 18:44:03 · answer #5 · answered by tranquility_base3@yahoo.com 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Neither would be good, though I think Rush may be a bit less inflammatory in the long run.
If it ever actually came down to the two of them, my only thought would be, what in the heck happened to all the liberals.
2007-03-13 18:47:33 · answer #6 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
THey way we're going, Rush SHould be President. Clinton did pot. Bush did Coke. It's only right we get an Opium addict as the next President.
2007-03-13 18:55:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If either were President, it would surely be a sign of the end of times.
2007-03-13 18:43:57 · answer #8 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Rush.
2007-03-13 18:53:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
they would be a great team- no matter which one was on top. Butt i believe Ann would be a better VP. She knows how to put dirty old men(senators) in thier place .
2007-03-13 19:01:56 · answer #10 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋