Should life scientists organize themselves based on the way species are scientifically classified?

Question

Would such a hierechical organizational aproach make the most of funding, be the quickest, the most efficient and the most effective way to organize scientists, university professors and students around the world in the effort to scientifically identify and study all species and to help pass the best laws to identify and protect those species and habitats at risk in what ways are scientifically proven to be best.

It would help those scientists professors and students to best work together and communicate in the best possible way and it would also allow for promotion towards the top when ones merits called for it and allow new scientists to focus on one species at a time.

Sorry If I'm not to clear but try to think about what I've said and try to reason it out for yourself and tell me what do you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_classification

ok check this out, its a way scientists came up with to organize species. What I'm sayying is use it as a templet to model the the hierachy of scientists who try to identify and study those species and who aim to identify and protect them from the threats they face. So every "Domain" has people assigned to it, and so does every "Kingdom", "Phylum", "Subphylum", "Class", "Subclass", "Order", "Suborder", "Family", "Subfamily", "Genus", and finally "Species" obviously starting from the top down to make sure all life was covered and then working the way down the system putting people in areas with critical threats to them or importent research that could yeild benifical results to the most people first. I hope this makes a little more sense? anyone get this at all?

Answer 1

I'm sorry, but this is about as clear as mud! Most organizations, academic, govermental, or commercial, have a hierarchy of organization. What characteristics did you have in mind. (The GEICO commercial comes to mind here for some reason . . . are you talking about 'cave men'?