In world war 1,the goal of germany's schlieffen plan for military attack was to...?

Question

which is the best answer?and why..
A.Avoid fighting a war on two fronts at once.
B.Control the seas through unrestricted submarine warfare.
C.Reclaim Alsace-Lorraine from france .
D.Extend German territory east into Russia.

Answer 1

the answer is A

The Schlieffen Plan called for Germany to faint an attack DIRECTLY into France - however 6 divisions were to invade via Belgium and out flank the hastily scrambled French Army. The idea was to capture Paris within 2-3 months and then send as many troops as could be spared to the Eastern. Thus Germany would has destroyed the Western Front preventing Allied counter offensives and descimate Russian troops.

Had the German High Command followed though with the original plan then Germany would've won the First World War and the second World War would never have occured....

Answer 2

I dont like any of them choices. Is there an E?

Seriously - The answer is A - it would have to be wouldnt it?

I mean u cant use an army to do unrestricted submarine warfare - so it cant be B. And Germany already had Alsace-Lorraine so it cant be C. And it cant be D because Germany attacked West into France, and Germany was already at war with Russia so it cant be D.

So if its not B, its not C, its not D - maybe A?

Answer 3

A, The goal of the schlieffen plan was to solve the problem of a two front war. France and Russia held a border with Germany. The plan was to attack France through Belgium and take the Capital Paris. Then turn around and assault Russia all before Russia could mobilize for war.

Answer 4

A

the plan was had the upset to invaded and win off France as quickly as possible and then to transfer all the troops to the other front against the Russian army which was slower to mobilizes.

Answer 5

the protection rigidity might become in direct violation of the Versailles Treaty that ended WW1 however the worldwide places which ought to have been imposing it, specifically England and France, have been too wrapped up with their very own issues to end the violations, an attitude of letting Hitler do it using fact he become a actual looking individual and not probably initiate a conflict (appeasement) and using out of u . s . a . "agencies" helping the Germans enhance weapons at the same time as they shred in the outcomes combines. In 1939-1940 the German area become no longer in technologies, this got here approximately in 40 two-40 5 section extra, yet particularly in the tactical application of the weapons. French tanks have been better in armor and weaponry to the German Pz-a million and Pz-2 yet we deployed in small communities or maybe in my opinion to help the infantry in attacking or protecting; the Germans used them em mass. the strategy become certainly defined via a British usual yet Germany become the only u . s . a . that tailored it; something theory it become too radical. u . s . a . of america in this mixture become deeply in touch in an isolationist attitude and theory that with the Atlantic and Pacific retaining them no longer something become worth annoying approximately interior of something of the international.

Answer 6

I'm pretty sure it is C