English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

to customize and for speed? i like them.. i like the older ones better like the late 90's...how are they in your opinion?

2007-03-13 15:13:36 · 9 answers · asked by Chris Webb 2 in Cars & Transportation Other - Cars & Transportation

9 answers

Aww, geez. The Eclipse, one of my personal favourites. Ok...first off...go with a '95-'98. This is the model that is THE most popular. It has all the upgrades, all the engine stuff, body kits, pretty much everything you could think of. Its like the Honda Civic, you can do pretty much anything to it, and people have. The only thing is that most are Rear-Wheel Drive, which can be kinda hard to drive in the winter, but it doesnt sound like youre going to be doing that...hehe:)

2007-03-13 15:18:21 · answer #1 · answered by Brandon B 2 · 0 0

if its the 2.4L its the same engine as the Dodge Caliber, and other 2.4L 4 cylinder chrysler products. If its the 3L its the same engine that used in the Dodge Caravan, and other 3L Chrysler products. Either or, they have a habbit of having bad oil leaks. I know, I have owned Mitsubushi built engines before, and after only a few thousand kilometers, the engines are covered in leaking oil. I have had to reseal the engine in our Caravan countless times. I have owned vehilces with past Mitsubushi engines, and the same story, 2.2L, 2.5L, ect, and the same stories go, major oil leaks. If you don't mind handing out a few thousand to have the engines resealed (all new gaskets and seals) every few years or so, they are good. If you're one of thoes people who believe that nothing goes wrong with a new car, and they don't leak, this is not the car for you. I work in a garage and I see over and over again oil leaks from Mitsubushi engines. Just today I had a 2003 Mitsubushi Outlander (?) with the 2.4L and it was just covered in old leaked oil. I don't see any other vehicle manufacture with engines that leak this much on all the engines they make, and these arn't old cars either, some of them are 2004,2005,2006. The next closest engine to leak this bad constantly, would be Ford with the Tempo/Topaz.

2007-03-13 15:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by gregthomasparke 5 · 0 0

yes hav u seen fast n furious 1 + 2?
they both have modded eclipse's
(numba 1 has the older eclipse)
i m hoping 2 get 1 for my first car

2007-03-13 15:18:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That car is great...in my opinion. I'm saving up to buy one of the newer versions now:) I can't decide between that one Nissan Murano, Pontiac Firebird or Toyota Celica. I love sports car, but not for their speed. They just look good. I know the Nissan Murano isn't sporty but I still like it :)

2007-03-13 15:16:15 · answer #4 · answered by soaddicted2this 4 · 0 0

It good, but my opinion is nissan or ford,
The best nissan car is the ALTIMA,
The best ford car is MUSTANG VERY NICE AND FAST SPORT CAR

2007-03-13 15:18:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I could think of lots better. Perhaps toyota and nissan.

2007-03-13 15:15:30 · answer #6 · answered by Kill_Me_Now! 5 · 0 0

yes very good race car if ur into racing but good family car also

2007-03-13 15:16:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it's just OK.. but if u want the best and u're into racing then go with subaru. ;)

2007-03-13 15:18:46 · answer #8 · answered by Ichigo 4 · 0 0

Mitsubishi redesigned its top-selling series for 2000, dropping turbocharged engines and all-wheel drive, but making a V6 available for the first time. The American-built front-drive hatchback sport coupe was 2 inches longer in wheelbase, 3 inches longer overall, and some 2 inches taller than its predecessor. RS and GT models used a 4-cylinder engine, while the top-line GT now had a V6. A manual transmission was standard. Automatic was optional and, on the GS and GT, included a Sportronic manual-shift mode. Front side airbags and antilock brakes were exclusive to the GT, part of a Premium Package option that also included leather upholstery. Standard features included alloy wheels, air conditioning, CD stereo, and power windows and locks. The RS had 15-inch wheels, the GS 16-inch, and the GT 17-inch tires. GT coupes added aerodynamic body trim and had rear disc brakes instead of drums.







Year-to-Year Changes
2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse: A Spyder convertible arrived in summer 2000, as an early 2001 model. Coupes got a few minor feature changes. Both the coupe and the Spyder came in GS and GT trim, along with a price-leader RS coupe. Spyders included a power soft top, with glass rear window. All models had an engine immobilizer. Antilock brakes were standard on the GT Spyder. Leather upholstery was available for GTs and the GS Spyder. Coupes gained rear child-seat anchors this year. GS and GT models added a standard rear spoiler. A new GS coupe Sun and Sound package included a sunroof and premium audio system. A similar Sun, Sound, and Leather package--with leather upholstery was available for the GT coupe.

2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse: The only changes for 2002: two new exterior colors; a new Mitsubishi logo; and for GS and GT, glovebox and vanity-mirror lighting.

2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse: GTS became the top of the line. All Eclipses got revised front-end styling, new taillamps, restyled instruments, and new interior color combinations are appearance updates.

2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse: The Eclipse remains unchanged for 2004.

2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse: Eclipse hatchback coupes and Spyder convertibles return for 2005 in GS, GT, and GTS trim. The price-leader RS coupe is dropped.





2000-2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse: Road TestPros Cons
Acceleration (V6)
Handling/roadholding
Front-seat comfort Road noise
Rear-seat room
Rear visibility
Rear-seat entry/exit


Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
More mature and refined than their rough-and-tumble predecessors, Eclipses deliver a pliant, comfortable, sporty-coupe ride. Handling is alert and responsive with little cornering lean and grippy front-drive predictability, though maneuvers are hampered by a large turning circle. Wheel patter still turns up on washboard surfaces, but it's not bothersome. Engines are much improved. Whereas the old 2.0-liter fours were throbby and loud, the new 2.4 liter is generally smooth and quiet. It packs respectable punch, at least with manual shift--which is a pleasure to use. The V6-powered GT doesn't rocket away like the old turbocharged models, but it's plenty quick--and naturally, suffers no irritating turbo lag. A GT with automatic reached 60 mph in 8.3 seconds and averaged 21.8 mpg. Surprisingly, the V6 is hardly quieter than the 4 cylinder. Furthermore, the body transmits noticeable tire noise except on glassy pavement. Wind rush is nicely tamed, even with the frameless door glass. Despite a more spacious cabin feel, Eclipses remain cozy 2+2 models with a teeny back seat and wiggle-in entry/exit. Front buckets hug one's torso, and should be comfortable on long rides. Driving positions are low-slung, and visibility remains difficult directly aft and over the shoulder. Taller drivers might wish the standard tilt steering wheel moved higher. Gauges and controls are clear and handy, but air-conditioner buttons are hard to see in daylight. Luggage space is generous in coupes with the back seat folded, limited in Spyders, but the load lip is lofty and the hatch lid heavy. Bulky doors may close with a tinny clang. Cowl shake occurs over bumps with a Spyder, but structural stiffness is acceptable and its soft top seals tightly.






Value for the Money
Though not quite as inspiring as a Honda Prelude, Eclipses compare well against most anything in their class. A GT might be the best choice, but few will feel penalized in one of the less-expensive 4-cylinder models. Spyders have no direct rivals in their price league.


Consumer Guide® Road-Test Ratings
2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT, automatic Rating

Performance 6
Fuel Economy 6
Ride Quality 4
Steering/Handling/Braking 7
Quietness 3
Controls/Materials 5
Room/Comfort/Driver Seating (front) 4
Room/Comfort (rear) 1
Cargo Room 5
Value within Class 3

Total 44

Each vehicle report contains one rating chart for a representative model. Consumer Guide® rates in ten key areas: Performance, Fuel Economy, Ride Comfort, Steering and Handling, Interior Noise, Controls and Materials, Driver Room, Passenger Room, Cargo Capacity, and Insurance Costs. These ratings compare the particular vehicle rated to ALL other vehicles, not a vehicle's standing in a particular class. In the ratings table, "1" is the lowest rating and "10" is the highest rating.







2000-2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse: Reliability
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide's® Auto Editors have scoured repair bulletins and questioned mechanics to search for commonly occurring problems for a particular vehicle. In some cases we also give possible manufacturer-suggested solutions. In many instances these trouble spots are Technical Service Bulletins posted by the manufacturer, however, we have our own expert looking at additional vehicle problems.Audio system: A short causes popping noises from the speakers when the power seat is operated. A jumper harness with a filter has been released for installation under the seat. (1999-2001)

Automatic transmission: The automatic transmission may shudder, surge, or vibrate due to thermal breakdown of the original transmission fluid (SPII). The system must be flushed and refilled with revised fluid (SPIII). (1999-2001)

Hard starting: The starter may not run due to a faulty theft-alarm relay (automatic transmission) or a faulty starter relay (manual transmission). Revised relays are available to fix the problem. (2000)

Sunroof/moonroof: The sunroof may skip/stick during operation requiring a countermeasure drive-cable assembly. (2000-01)

Vehicle noise: Banging, creaking, and popping noises from the front end are usually due to dry stabilizer-bar bushings. Revised bushings are available as replacements. (1999-2000)

Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
This table lists costs of likely repairs for comparison with other vehicles. The dollar amount includes the cost of the part(s) and labor (based on $50 per hour) for the typical repair without extras or add-ons. Like the pricing information, replacement costs can vary widely depending on region. Expect charges at a new-car dealership to be slightly higher.

Item Name Repair Cost

A/C Compressor $585
Alternator $620
Automatic Transmission or Transaxle $1,025
Brakes $350
Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing $460
Constant Velocity Joints $1,220
Exhaust System $370
Radiator $495
Shocks and/or Struts $1,010
Timing Chain or Belt $340


NHTSA Recall History
2000 V6: Power-steering pipe could wear through, allowing fluid leakage. Can result in a fire and continued loss of fluid will result in a loss of power assist, increasing the risk of a crash.

2000-05: Bilingual English/Spanish removable airbag warning labels on dashboard and sunvisor do meet size requirements.

2001: Bulge in fuel tank caused by manufacturing process on small number of vehicles resulted in thinning of material, increasing risk of fuel leakage.

2001: Harness for crankshaft position sensor could contact new protective shield, causing grounded circuit; prolonged contact could cause wiring insulation to wear and eventually to ground out, causing engine to die.

2001: Some incorrect driver+s seat mounting bolts were installed.

2004 Spyder: Fuel return hose fitting on electric fuel pump may have been improperly molded, which could result in fuel leakage.






2000-2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse: Prices

Prices Good Average Poor

2000
Eclipse GT coupe $7,000-7,700 $6,200-6,900 $3,300-3,600
Eclipse RS, GS coupe $5,500-6,300 $4,700-5,400 $2,300-2,600
2001
Eclipse GT coupe $7,900-8,800 $7,100-7,900 $4,000-4,500
Eclipse RS, GS coupe $6,400-7,300 $5,600-6,400 $2,800-3,200
Spyder GT conv. $10,000-11,000 $9,000-9,900 $5,200-5,700
Spyder convertible $8,800-9,800 $7,900-8,800 $4,600-5,100
2002
Eclipse GT coupe $9,500-10,500 $8,600-9,500 $4,900-5,500
Eclipse RS, GS coupe $7,500-8,700 $6,800-7,800 $3,800-4,400
Spyder GT conv. $12,000-13,200 $10,800-11,900 $6,700-7,400
Spyder convertible $10,500-11,500 $9,500-10,400 $5,600-6,100
2003
Eclipse GT/GTS coupe $10,800-12,000 $9,700-10,800 $5,800-6,500
Eclipse RS, GS coupe $8,800-10,000 $7,900-9,000 $4,600-5,200
Spyder GT/GTS conv. $13,500-14,700 $12,300-13,400 $8,000-8,700
Spyder convertible $12,000-13,200 $10,800-11,900 $6,700-7,400
2004
Eclipse GT/GTS coupe $12,700-14,000 $11,600-12,700 $7,400-8,100
Eclipse RS, GS coupe $10,500-12,000 $9,500-10,800 $5,600-6,400
Spyder GS conv. $13,800-15,200 $12,600-13,800 $8,400-9,300
Spyder GT/GTS conv. $15,300-16,800 $13,900-15,300 $9,800-10,800
2005
Eclipse GS coupe $12,500-14,000 $11,300-12,600 $7,100-8,000
Eclipse GT/GTS coupe $14,500-16,000 $13,200-14,600 $9,000-9,900
Spyder GS conv. $16,000-17,500 $14,600-15,900 $10,200-11,200
Spyder GT/GTS conv. $17,500-19,000 $16,100-17,500 $11,200-12,200

This chart details a range of prices in year-by-year listings for vehicles in three condition levels: Good: a clean low-mileage, solid-running vehicle that needs little or no repair. Average: a car with normal miles on the odometer, perhaps a few scrapes or dings; engine might need a minor repair or two, but runs acceptably well. Poor: might have potentially dangerous problems with the engine and/or body, or abnormally high mileage; definitely in need of mechanical attention. Valuations reflect wholesale prices paid by dealers at auction, and retail prices on used-car lots. Each range covers all trim levels and engine types for a vehicle with a typical amount of equipment--usually an automatic transmission, air conditioning, stereo, etc. Fully loaded vehicles may cost more. Average mileage is 12,000 miles per year. Keep in mind that these are guidelines only. Actual selling prices vary-especially from region to region.








2000-2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse: Specs & Safety

Vehicle Dimensions
Specification 2-door convertible 2-door coupe
Wheelbase, in. 100.8 100.8
Overall Length, in. 175.4 175.4
Overall Width, in. 68.9 68.9
Overall Height, in. 52.8 51.6
Curb Weight, lbs. 3042 2822
Cargo Volume, cu. ft. 7.2 16.9
Standard Payload, lbs. -- --
Fuel Capacity, gals. 16.4 16.4
Seating Capacity 4 4
Front Head Room, in. 39.4 37.9
Max. Front Leg Room, in. 42.3 42.3
Rear Head Room, in. 34.5 34.9
Max. Rear Leg Room, in. 29.4 30.0


Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist.

Powertrain Options and Availability
In 2000, RS and GS models used a 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine that produced 145 horsepower with a 4-speed automatic, or 154 hp with 5-speed manual shift. The GT edition got a 3.0-liter V6, rated 200 horsepower with an automatic transmission or 205 hp with the manual gearbox. When equipped with automatic, the GT had a separate gate for manual gear changes. Subtle changes to the four-cylinder in subsequent years lowered horsepower ratings to 147 with manual, 140 with automatic.
Engines Size liters/
cu. in. Horse-
power Torque Transmission:
EPA city/hgwy Consumer Guide®
Observed


ohc I4 2.4 / 149 142-154 163 5-speed manual: 23/31
4-speed automatic: 20/28 5-speed manual: 23.3
4-speed automatic: --


ohc V6 3.0 / 181 200-205 205 5-speed manual: 20/28
4-speed automatic: 20/27 5-speed manual: --
4-speed automatic: 20.7




Engine Key: l/cu. in. = liters/cubic inches; ohv = overhead valve; ohc = overhead camshaft; dohc = dual overhead camshaft; I = inline cylinders; H = horizontally opposed cylinders; V = cylinders in a V configuration; W = cylinders in a W configuration; rpm = revolutions per minute; CVT = continuously variable (automatic) transmission; NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist.

NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's crashworthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Side-impact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.


Built In: USA

Drive Wheels: transverse front-engine/front-wheel drive

2007-03-13 15:19:31 · answer #9 · answered by Niki 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers