that scares me.
2007-03-13 14:52:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kit Untz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The universe might be expanding, but I doubt that we are. If the universe is expanding but the earth is not, then no, we are not expanding. If the universe is expanding and the earth, including all laws, gases, fundamental properties of nature, and existence itself, then possibly. However I think that our material bodies stay as they are, it is just the mind that experiences this sensation of expansion due to its logical analysis that the universe is expanding and that the mind is unlimited, so it expands, in a sense, with the expanding universe.
So yes due to the workings of our mind, but in reality no our bodies do not expand, and as for our souls then that would have to stay the same regardless of material expansion or not.
As for doubling in size, the size would reach an exponential so great that it would hit infinity and basically implode within itself. Either that is happening instantaneously and constantly, creating time as we know it, or it is increasing gradually like the bending of rubber.
Can it be disproven? No, not really, but I doubt it can be proven either.
2007-03-13 15:13:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, because the speed of light is invariant. Thus, measurements of the speed of light would appear to change over time if size were also changing.
And when we say the universe is expanding, we mean that at the leading edge of the universe, things are continually moving away from one another. We don't mean that the actual "things" are changing in size. If I say that the distance between me, standing on a platforrm, and a moving train is increasing (expanding), I don't mean that either the train or I are increasing in size.
2007-03-13 14:51:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Qwyrx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
somewhat, there has been "easy" lots longer than there has been a sunlight. If modern technology theories are best, lots of the celebrities are hundreds of thousands of years older than our sunlight. They presently estimate the beginning of the universe at 4.5 million years, and "easy" has been vacationing by way of it for all of the time. at the same time as our sunlight is a lot youthful than that. In verse 14, the place it speaks of God coming up the sunlight and moon, the verb used there's a factor annoying that suggests an action already in technique that's accomplished at that element. Verse one tells us that God made the "heavens" (which includes the celebrities - and ought to incorporate our sunlight) and the earth on the 1st day. however the act of putting the sunlight, earth and moon into the orbits that all of us understand in the present day, so as that we've 24 hour days with the sunlight and moon "ruling" over them grew to become into no longer accomplished till verse 19. back, modern medical concept teaches that the earth took a at the same time as to settle into the orbit that all of us understand in the present day, and that it could have been a collision with the article that grew to alter into our moon that located it there. So technology would not seem to have a controversy with "easy" being around before the sunlight, or with the earth latest before it settled into its modern orbit around the sunlight. or maybe in "those circumstances", human beings knew different easy components. such as hearth, the celebrities, lightening, volcanoes, fireflies, etc.
2016-10-18 07:57:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If absolutely everything was expanding, everything would appear to always be constant in relation to everything else. The fact that expansion can be measured (relative to ourselves) means that not everything is expanding.
2007-03-13 15:53:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by mcd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I certainly am (although I'm not doubling in size every second).
2007-03-13 14:56:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by pat z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing can really be totally disproven
2007-03-13 14:48:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That puts an interesting spin on the American obesity epidemic! ;-)
2007-03-13 15:47:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋