My boyfriend took his ex to court in November 2006 to modify the support he was paying because he was given joint custody instead of the partial custody he had. He now has his son half the time instead of some of the time. At this hearing both agreed to an amount that was actually based on support from 2004. She could have had more. They calculated first on current incomes (which came out the highest), then they calculated with his current income and an earning capacity on her (which was a little lower), then they calculated on the incomes from 2004 (which was the lowest). She picked the lowest and she was given all three options. Now four months later she files to modify it claiming the order was based on current incomes.
2007-03-13
14:34:49
·
4 answers
·
asked by
katriana30
2
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
The last line was supposed to read that she filed four months later claiming that the order was NOT based on current incomes.
2007-03-13
14:38:10 ·
update #1
That's just it they did agree. She was given all three amounts to choose from and she chose the lowest one. It's also been way past 20 days.
2007-03-13
14:52:04 ·
update #2
We think she picked the lowest amount because she was scamming welfare.
2007-03-13
15:30:51 ·
update #3