They did. It was called the Monroe Doctrine. Sure, it helped the US, but it also helped Simon Bolivar.
From Wikipedia:
United States and Great Britain
As a result of these successful revolts, United States President James Monroe asked Secretary of State John Quincy Adams to draft the Monroe Doctrine" It stated that the United States would not tolerate any European interference in the Western Hemisphere. This measure was taken in order to safeguard the newfound liberties revolutionaries such as Bolivar and Hidalgo fought for. Also, it was taken as a precautionary measure against the vast naval might of the United States' European contemporaries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_American_revolutions#United_States_and_Great_Britain
2007-03-13 11:20:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by parrotjohn2001 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
actual, a plenty later date may well be greater precise. We rejoice the date we declared independence, no longer the date the statement replaced into actual ratified nor the date we actual gained independence. we are taught to forget with regard to the actuality that we could have nonetheless lost the war and then putting forward our independence interior the Revolution could have been ineffective as we'd have remained colonies of Britian. we are additionally incorrectly taught that the 2nd Continental Congress signed the statement on July 4, 1776, for that reason ratifing it on that date. attempt August 2, 1776, that's the certainly date of ratification. to be sure that a record to actual be ratified those ratifying it may desire to sign their names to it to make the ratification good, lots of the delegates did no longer sign until August 2d with in basic terms Hancock signing July 4th. yet we had to win the war with the intention to surely benefit our independence. meaning a date of October 19, 1781 while Cronwallis surrendered to Washington, bringing the war to an end. then you certainly seem to September 3, 1783 while the Treaty of Paris replaced into ratified, formally ending the war and putting forward the colonies a sparkling, self reliant united states of america.
2016-10-02 01:50:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically because it wasn't their problem. Second I don't think South America would have like the idea in fear of changing Spain for another Imperial Master; if they would have done it then, maybe today South America wouldn't be independent.
2007-03-13 11:32:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They actually did indirectly with weapons and money without general public doctrine. The US has always had a understanding for colonies trying to free themselves from European ties due to their struggle with England. Plus, the US and Spain have never had great relationships. If my enemy is your enemy, then you are my friend sort of thing.
2007-03-13 11:24:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by willbakerman60 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They did. When Cuba imperialized spain the United States intervened. They wanted to protect their investments there.
2007-03-13 11:38:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mountain 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically these damned English Rednecks didnt think of conquer in that part of the world at the time,so why bother when your head is up your *** full of egotistic maniacs reaping profits of american indians and land off those great people....The Mexicans.!
2007-03-13 11:48:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by "EL GUAPO" 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They got their independence in time, but part of the reason was defense, part was debt, and part was mere hypocrisy. Welcome to politics.
2007-03-13 11:16:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
In two words----corporate profits.
2007-03-13 11:18:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kim 4
·
0⤊
2⤋