Why isn't President George W. Bush impeached?

Question

Bush's crimes to U.S. citizens and humanity.

1. Iraq War
He has lied to the American people that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, that was the main reason we went to war. He then suddenly said that it was a war to liberate the Iraqis. No it wasn't, his main focus was WMDs. Iraq had no connection to 9/11. There is no evidence Saddam Hussein collaborated with Osama Bin Laden or his Al Qaeda network. Saddam was against radical Islamic fundamentalists. The American government even funded Saddam in his war against Iran. The Bush administration fabricated evidence for the Iraq war in order to trick the American people. Most Americans can't locate Iraq on the global map. That is sad. Also, Iraqis must create their own nation without American presence.

2. Hurricane Katrina- Bush was on vacation while thousands of people lost their homes to the flooding. It took him almost a week to get his lazy butt down there. He even congratulated the head of FEMA at the time.

Answer 1

good question....If I were in Congress, I would have started impeachment proceedings..He is the worst prez since Nixon

Answer 2

Answer #1: Bush did not lie. He relied on the intellegence given to him, his cabinet and congress from 17 American intellegence agencies; all of which said Iraq had WMD. He never connected Iraq to 9/11. He actually said Iraq was not envolved in 9/11, but the country did in fact harbour terrorist that had the capability for another attack on America. The U.N passed resolution 1441, giving the authorization to use force if Saddam did not comply with weapons inspectors. (He didn't). He even went back to get another one when France demanded he get yet another one; but isn't Saddam violating 13 resolutions enough? Investigation after investigation shows that there was no crime commited and Bush did not lie. Liberal investigation after liberal investigation show that he did not lie. No crime was commited in going to war with Iraq and therefore no grounds for impeachment.

Answer #2: The local governments of Louisiana knew that Katrina was a category 5 hurricane and the levies were insufficient. They new days in advance. But neither Nagin nor Blanco decided to evacuate the City of New Orleans. More money has been given to New Oreleans than any other area hit by Katrina. (Alabama and Mississippi) yet those two areas have managed to almost fully recover 2 years later while NO is still a mess. Why? Because local governments have not even finished allocating monies for all the areas. The Katrina disaster is a failure of local government.

Both of your arguements are fallacious and without merit.

Answer 3

You sound like a dyed in the wool Dem. or a moron liberal! George W Bush has done nothing but try to counter terrorism. Have you forgotten 9/11? The reason there hasn't been MORE of that is because Bush had the courage to go after them. The weather people lie every day, should we fire all of them, or be grateful they get as much right as they do!! All during the Clinton years, it was "It's the economy, stupid". Now the economy is better than it has been for YEARS, and we should impeach the PRES.????!!!! You will be far happier if you do some real home work, find out what is really going on, and DON'T BELIEVE ALL THE TRASH THE LYING LIBERALS ARE SAYING!!!

Answer 4

Do you seriously believe ANY U.S. President never told a lie or didn't do what he was supposed to?

Lets look at Bill Clinton, who brought complete dishonor to the White House and the office of President when he had his playboy fantasy come true in the OVAL OFFICE. Americans dismissed the whole thing as if it were nothing. The man had no morals. And his wife is so hungry for political power, she looked the other way - now she wants to be president too?

Bill could have had Osamma Bin Ladin - but let the critter go. 9-11 was the thanks we got and Bush who just got into office got the blame from the very people who dismissed Clinton's affairs.

White Water - key witnesses started dying off and no one, NOT ONE person lifted a finger to question the matter on any serious level.

I could go on and on, but why bother. Bill got caught red handed, and the American people just shrugged. He could have had men killed to cover his butt - and no one cared enough to investigate.

So Bush is evil? Bush is bad? Bush needs to be impeached? Why look the other way for Billy Boy but demand Bush be hung out to dry? Think about it.

Answer 5

answer #a million: Bush did no longer lie. He depended on the intellegence given to him, his cabinet and congress from 17 American intellegence businesses; all of which stated Iraq had WMD. He by no skill related Iraq to 9/11. He actual stated Iraq replaced into no longer envolved in 9/11, however the rustic did quite harbour terrorist that had the opportunity of yet another attack on united statesa.. The U.N handed decision 1441, giving the authorization to apply rigidity if Saddam did no longer adjust to weapons inspectors. (He did no longer). He even went decrease back to get yet another one while France demanded he get yet yet another one; yet isn't Saddam violating 13 resolutions adequate? study after study shows that there replaced into no crime commited and Bush did no longer lie. Liberal study after liberal study tutor that he did no longer lie. No crime replaced into commited in going to war with Iraq and subsequently no grounds for impeachment. answer #2: The close by governments of Louisiana knew that Katrina replaced right into a sort 5 typhoon and the levies have been inadequate. They new days in strengthen. yet neither Nagin nor Blanco desperate to evacuate the city of recent Orleans. greater money has been given to New Oreleans than the different section hit by way of Katrina. (Alabama and Mississippi) yet those 2 aspects have controlled to incredibly much totally get better 2 years later jointly as NO remains a multitude. Why? because of the fact close by governments have not even complete allocating monies for each and all the climate. The Katrina disaster is a failure of close by government. the two one in all your arguements are unsuitable and devoid of advantage.

Answer 6

What are Impeachable Offenses?

Summary: According to the Constitution: "...Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". Treason and Bribery are clear. The definition of "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" was left intentionally vague by the founders but is generally considered to refer to misconduct or a violation of the public trust that is injurious to society. They are not limited to statutory violations (breaking regular laws).

Answer 7

People are to quick to use the impeach word anymore. Frankly he is not even close to being impeachable, since he has not gotten caught doing anything criminal or under the table. Notice that I say he hasn't gotten caught. All presidents have to do things we don't even know about and all have been crooked in their own ways. So what if he was on vacation during a hurricane. He is not omnipresent and infallible. I am not defending him, just stating the facts. Believe me now and hear me later, he will NOT be impeached.

Answer 8

among Canadas many contributions to the katrina crisis,was a 120 man tactical rescue team from Vancouver,Canada.they came fully equipped and self sustainined with food,water,fuel,medical supplies,and the latest technology and equipment for water rescue operations.they were supplied to stay a minimum 40 days.well,they went down to new orleans,and spent about 2 weeks getting SHOT AT by blacks,and then they were sent home.a CBC reporter was down there and interveiwed them,and then the story was covered up,and i never heard anything about it again.i say bush should have let those looters drown.

Answer 9

Name 1 just 1 politician who hasn't lied just 1. In order to be impeached there needs to be a crime.All the Dem's said there were WMD also. I say get rid of them all

Answer 10

Apparently it is more important that a president has illicit relations with the opposite sex and doesn't want to tell the world about it, than it is for a president send over 300o young Americans to their death under false pretenses.

Ask the coulter type poly followers they'll explain in their own imitable and hateful way.

Answer 11

This question has been asked MANY times before on Y/A by other ignorant people who make their manic hatred the basis of their question...not the truth and not the facts.
The President has not committed an impeachable offense.