If The Theory Of Evolution Is Correct Why Do We.......?

Question

.....Concern ourselves with propagating the Human Race and our vested interest in its continued continuation, when clearly, once extintct, we would be back in no time (well,) via evolution.

We are not programmed but brainwashed

376 is not following. Nothing is assumed by me. Stick to the question

Answer 1

Evolution is the greatest hoax in history, and climate change the second greatest.
They are both examples of the 'Emperor's New Clothes' syndrome, where if you say something often enough and authoritively enough it becomes indisputable fact.
Unfortunately for the advocates of these tactics, you also 'cannot fool all the people all of the time' and there is a rapidly growing movement against this manipulation of 'truth'.
People are waking up to the fact that there are those who have a vested interest in hoodwinking them. They now realise that the notion of the objective scientist is just a myth. Everyone is biased, everyone has their own point of view based on their own prejudices, funding criteria, career prospects and philosophical beliefs, this is every bit as true for scientists as for the man in the street.
Do not trust anything a scientist says, merely because they are a scientist, when all else fails they will try to blind you with science. Don't fall for it, Question everything and be very suspicious, very, very suspicious. Good honest scientists will welcome this, because they know that science has been hi-jacked by those to whom their own beliefs are paramount, and that is why the success of Darwinism has led to such a decline in scientific integrity.
So to answer your question - -
the theory of evolution is not correct, so the rest of the question is irrelevant.

Answer 2

There is an innate disposition in humans, as well as many other animals, to give support and assistance to individuals of the same species who are genetically close to us (i.e. relatives). There is a similar, although weaker impulse to help individuals we are not related to but in regular contact with, and a still weaker impulse to help other members of the same species as this does benefit us through, amongst other things, reciprocated altruism (i.e. if we help others we are more likely to be helped in turn). This characteristic is believed to have arisen as it is genetically advantageous to assist closely related individuals, as this helps ensure our own genes will survive, even if we as individuals do not reproduce. This is the root of our wish to keep the human race going.

If humanity were to become extinct for some reason there is no guarantee that a successor intelligent race would ever evolve, and as this would be completely unrelated to humanity anyway we have no vested genetic interest in helping it, but only in trying to preserve our own species.

Answer 3

Darwin had no detailed knowledge of genes. If he did his theory would indicate that the genetic code would get longer as creatures evolved. bugs would have some of the shortest while humans would have the longest. fact is moths have 600 genes and humans 46 and our closest relative, chimps have 48. Science takes a humorously long approach, which is more entertaining than Reagan's voodoo economics, to explain it but when all is said and done, God made us. In time all will be revealed.

Answer 4

There is absolutely no guarantee evolution will create homo sapiens if we became extinct and allowed eons of time to pass.
First, the Earth is not the same planet as was when our earliest ancestors began to evolve into homo sapiens.

Secondly, because the Earth's condition (the soup/mix), is not identical as in the primordal soup/mix, then any species as we know them, can evolve into any number of different species which could evolve and thus have the upper hand and prevent the homo austrolopithicus from establishing itself and thus preventing homo spiens evolving.

Answer 5

Evolution takes place on a metaphysical plane, it is an energy, light, or consciousness. It is closely tied to emotions and the development of maturity. Note that evolution in nature always moves towards unity and diversity. Notice that this in humans is synonymous with love and acceptance of differences. This is the one thing that will prevent humanity from destroying itself...


i bet you didnt understand a word i said,,,,,,,lol....
i am just crazy,,,,,,

Answer 6

What do you propose as an alternative? We're programmed by our genes to replicate ourselves as much as possible. As a species, we're intelligent enough to realize that through a vague process called "civilization", greater birth rates and lower death rates, as well as heightened standards of living, can be brought about by human design. Why destroy ourselves and lose all the progress we've had up to this point? Are you TRYING to push pointless Armageddon-war worldwide, justifying it with no real justification?

Answer 7

if humanity would have died out, im presuming that 'we' would not come back being anything like we are today or else we would not have become 'instinct' in the first place.
However 'we' would not be back in no time anyway rather some other kind of creature would replace us (not evolve from us as that would require us to still be alive)

Answer 8

Um, it seems obvious that a strong desire to live would be an early trait seen in animals. The desire to live and protect ones self would be extremely advantages for survival. So the ones who didn't posses this died off. Our desire to protect ourselves, our family, our community and our race (mostly in that order of importance) is a simple social trait seen in all social animals. Think about a pack of wolves.

Answer 9

We continue betting on the same horse we always have. Humanity.

The only problem I have with evolution is we have these species that have changed over time (finches on Galapagos, the moths in England, Flying squirrels.) but they are still the same species.
People are adapting and changing too, but were all still people.

Answer 10

survival of a species is an evolutionary trait in all livings things, not just humans. and no you can't argue that we will be back via evolution. the factors that went into creating human life into what it is took billions of years of evolution through chance and circumstance. it would be next to impossible to recreate those exact same conditions over again.